new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Ranked #379 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, this places MET-SOL in a monitor-and-hold category rather than identifying it as a clear new-entry leader. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee activity and 0.0% collapsed, or sustained MET/SOL volatility produced adverse range exposure; stronger volume with stable liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-05 18:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$59.27K
Total value locked
$0.00
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -6.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined range-reset rule: if MET/SOL moves sharply enough that the position is no longer centered in its chosen ticks, withdraw and reset the range rather than leaving capital passively exposed. Reassess the position if fee activity weakens materially from the current 0.00x turnover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.00 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#15 of 29 MET-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1200 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #12683 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes between MET and SOL can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and reduce your result.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 100%. Reward dependency is not established by the available data, but the current APR is fee-led rather than emission-led. As a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary support: emission decay or expiry would remove the reward component and leave fee income as the remaining source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
The supplied data does not report a seven-day impermanent-loss reading or tick-in-range percentage, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified here. MEMECOIN exposure adds a material exit-timing risk: a sharp MET move against SOL can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while a rapid fall in trading activity can reduce fee income. Emission decay is also relevant to this family, even though the current return is not reward-funded.
tollMET Context
MET is the memecoin side of this pair, and providing liquidity makes the LP progressively hold more MET when MET underperforms SOL and less MET when it outperforms. Liquidity depth for MET outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp MET move can increase both execution risk and impermanent loss for this position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established settlement asset in the pair and provides the reference against which MET price action is measured. SOL strength relative to MET tends to leave the LP with more MET exposure, while MET strength tends to leave the LP with more SOL; SOL liquidity elsewhere may improve execution, but it does not remove pair-level impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes between MET and SOL can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and reduce your result.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HAnfNeJmMBXgjycbJ1ouLjvuBxUx4aNXKEbDC721VMYG
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.0% and fee income is 0.0%. If future emissions are added and then decay, the reward portion would fall first, leaving trading fees as the core return.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.0% and fee income is 0.0%. If future emissions are added and then decay, the reward portion would fall first, leaving trading fees as the core return.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove the fee component of 0.0%. It could still reduce the headline total APR and make the pool more dependent on its limited trading activity.
Because the current reward-only component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove the fee component of 0.0%. It could still reduce the headline total APR and make the pool more dependent on its limited trading activity.
Risk is higher than in a major-asset pair because MET can move sharply against SOL and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The missing recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings also limit measurement of current range risk.
Risk is higher than in a major-asset pair because MET can move sharply against SOL and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The missing recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings also limit measurement of current range risk.
Consider exiting or resetting when MET/SOL moves the position far from its chosen range, when trading fees no longer justify the exposure, or when pool liquidity begins draining. For this pool, a sustained decline from the current 0.00x turnover would weaken the fee case.
Consider exiting or resetting when MET/SOL moves the position far from its chosen range, when trading fees no longer justify the exposure, or when pool liquidity begins draining. For this pool, a sustained decline from the current 0.00x turnover would weaken the fee case.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and future volume can change. At 0.0% annualized, a loss equal to one year's fee accrual would take roughly one year to offset only if fee flow, liquidity, and price conditions remained stable.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and future volume can change. At 0.0% annualized, a loss equal to one year's fee accrual would take roughly one year to offset only if fee flow, liquidity, and price conditions remained stable.
