new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: ai_engine is hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1002 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools indicates a weak relative position rather than a protocol-wide failure, but the score reflects the combination of thin activity, zero reward contribution, and memecoin exposure. The assessment would improve if sustained volume raised fee income, liquidity deepened without a corresponding volume collapse, or a durable incentive program began; it would worsen with a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or a sharper MET dislocation.
Computed 2026-10-05 11:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$185.44K
Total value locked
$15.88
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -21.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range only if you can monitor MET actively, and set an exit trigger for a sustained drop in fee volume or a material TVL drain; with 0.00x volume-to-liquidity activity and a EXIT verdict, do not leave the position unattended.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $15.88 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USDC-MET pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1342 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21609 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-MET liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and MET into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can change as traders buy and sell MET, and the current return depends on trading fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield coming from fees. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current reward contribution to offset weak trading activity. APR therefore depends on volume continuing to generate fees rather than on emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure cannot be quantified from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET price shocks can move liquidity out of range and leave the LP with a larger share of the weaker asset; concentrated liquidity may require active repositioning. Emission decay is not the main current risk because reward APR is zero, but any future incentives could decline quickly, so exit timing should follow fee volume and MET price behavior rather than headline APR.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stablecoin side of the pair and normally provides the less volatile inventory anchor for this LP. Its liquidity is generally deeper across Solana markets than a memecoin's, so USDC price movement is usually not the main source of pool risk. When MET falls or rises sharply against USDC, the LP's inventory composition changes through arbitrage and can crystallize opportunity cost relative to holding the tokens separately.
tollMET Context
MET is the memecoin side of the pair and is the principal source of directional and liquidity risk. Its price action determines whether the position remains within its selected range and whether rebalancing or withdrawal becomes necessary. A sharp MET move can generate fees while still creating adverse inventory exposure if the move pushes liquidity out of range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and MET into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can change as traders buy and sell MET, and the current return depends on trading fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HuPRxaBcjQYrHj6scpQxUa6QqJsS2iA1TXMEEuVWPhog
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
2%
APR
19%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
This pool currently has 0.0% reward APR, so emission decay is not currently reducing a reward component. Total APR of 0.1% is driven by 0.1%, and future emissions would matter only if rewards are added.
This pool currently has 0.0% reward APR, so emission decay is not currently reducing a reward component. Total APR of 0.1% is driven by 0.1%, and future emissions would matter only if rewards are added.
Because reward APR is already 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The remaining yield would be fee-based at 0.1%, and it would fall if trading activity does not support those fees.
Because reward APR is already 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The remaining yield would be fee-based at 0.1%, and it would fall if trading activity does not support those fees.
The main risks are MET price volatility, concentrated liquidity moving out of range, and insufficient volume to compensate for adverse inventory changes. This pool has $185K in liquidity, a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and 100% of yield from fees, so the fee buffer is dependent on limited observed activity.
The main risks are MET price volatility, concentrated liquidity moving out of range, and insufficient volume to compensate for adverse inventory changes. This pool has $185K in liquidity, a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio, and 100% of yield from fees, so the fee buffer is dependent on limited observed activity.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee volume continues to weaken, TVL drains, MET moves sharply outside your range, or the EXIT signal persists without improving fee generation. The current score of 17/100 and Exit threshold of 80/100 support treating those conditions as exit triggers rather than waiting for emissions.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee volume continues to weaken, TVL drains, MET moves sharply outside your range, or the EXIT signal persists without improving fee generation. The current score of 17/100 and Exit threshold of 80/100 support treating those conditions as exit triggers rather than waiting for emissions.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading volume. At the stated 0.1% fee APR, a simple static estimate would require roughly one year divided by the decimal fee APR before fees offset an equivalent loss, but MET volatility and changing volume can make the actual period much longer or shorter.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading volume. At the stated 0.1% fee APR, a simple static estimate would require roughly one year divided by the decimal fee APR before fees offset an equivalent loss, but MET volatility and changing volume can make the actual period much longer or shorter.
