new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That HOLD assessment is consistent with the listed verdict driver, ai_engine=hold: the pool has fee-funded yield but limited turnover for its liquidity base. Its rank of #1114 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but does not remove memecoin liquidity and exit risk. A sustained TVL drain, lower fee APR, weaker volume, or a shift toward reward-dependent yield would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-09-25 02:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$66.15K
Total value locked
$326.63
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set an alert for a sustained decline in $66K together with weakening $327; exit rather than wait for a rebalance if both deteriorate, because the pool's fee income depends entirely on trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $326.63 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.82 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-BASED pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1545 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3669 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BASED liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BASED into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the two tokens can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and make it harder to exit at a favorable price.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99%. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component contributes no reported APR, so emission changes are not currently the main source of stated yield. For a memecoin pool, any future emissions should be treated as time-sensitive rather than permanent fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-range occupancy are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and the share of liquidity currently earning fees cannot be validated from these metrics. SOL-BASED is a MEMECOIN pool: emission schedules can decay, token demand can weaken quickly, and exit liquidity can deteriorate before an LP can rebalance. Exit timing therefore matters more than headline APR if BASED volume or market depth contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established Solana-side asset in this pair and has substantially broader liquidity across the network than a typical memecoin. If SOL rises or falls materially against BASED, the pool rebalances toward the weaker-performing asset, making SOL price direction a direct contributor to the LP's relative outcome.
tollBASED Context
BASED is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and a smaller set of venues than SOL's. A sharp BASED move can increase rebalancing losses, while a decline in BASED demand can reduce swap volume and make exiting the LP position more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BASED into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the two tokens can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and make it harder to exit at a favorable price.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2kdetobhYcWVu8m6C2NRpDGYAiJLoj3R3AHnK4Sb4bZz
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- BASED (Em4rcuhX…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
81%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
33%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.2% and total APR is 1.2%. If future incentives are added, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time, but it would not directly reduce fees generated by swaps.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.2% and total APR is 1.2%. If future incentives are added, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time, but it would not directly reduce fees generated by swaps.
Because the current reward component is 0.0% and 99% of yield comes from fees, expiration would have little direct effect on the reported APR unless incentives are introduced later. After expiration, the pool's economics would depend on BASED trading volume and the resulting fee APR.
Because the current reward component is 0.0% and 99% of yield comes from fees, expiration would have little direct effect on the reported APR unless incentives are introduced later. After expiration, the pool's economics would depend on BASED trading volume and the resulting fee APR.
Risk is material because BASED can move sharply against SOL, producing losses relative to simply holding the tokens, while memecoin volume and exit liquidity can contract quickly. The pool has $66K, $327 of 24-hour volume, and 1.2% total APR, so fees may not compensate for a rapid price move or liquidity decline.
Risk is material because BASED can move sharply against SOL, producing losses relative to simply holding the tokens, while memecoin volume and exit liquidity can contract quickly. The pool has $66K, $327 of 24-hour volume, and 1.2% total APR, so fees may not compensate for a rapid price move or liquidity decline.
Consider exiting when BASED demand weakens alongside a sustained fall in $327 or $66K, or when fee income no longer justifies exposure to SOL-BASED price divergence. Waiting for rewards to offset a deteriorating market can be ineffective when the reward component is 0.0%.
Consider exiting when BASED demand weakens alongside a sustained fall in $327 or $66K, or when fee income no longer justifies exposure to SOL-BASED price divergence. Waiting for rewards to offset a deteriorating market can be ineffective when the reward component is 0.0%.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, and recovery depends on future SOL-BASED price convergence and trading fees. At 1.2% fee APR, fees accumulate gradually, so a large or persistent price divergence may take substantially longer to offset than a small one.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, and recovery depends on future SOL-BASED price convergence and trading fees. At 1.2% fee APR, fees accumulate gradually, so a large or persistent price divergence may take substantially longer to offset than a small one.
