new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 56/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 52/100, Hold 61/100, and Exit 20/100, supports a selective hold rather than an unqualified entry. The live verdict is HOLD, and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold; the pool ranks #85 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it well above most listed pools on that ranking without removing memecoin or execution risk. The assessment would change if $15.4M drained materially, volume weakened enough to reduce fee income, the fee-only APR collapsed, or sustained price divergence produced unfavorable LP inventory.
Computed 2026-09-05 11:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$15.36M
Total value locked
$1.23M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 6.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range wide enough for memecoin volatility, monitor the position when price approaches either range boundary, and rebalance or exit if the position leaves range or fee income no longer compensates for the observed BOME-SOL divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 6.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.23M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.08K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 BOME-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1401 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3348 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BOME-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOME and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings automatically shift between the two assets as traders use the pool, so the dollar value can differ from simply holding BOME and SOL separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 6.8% from swap fees and 0.2% from rewards. 97% means the displayed return is currently supported by fees rather than emissions. Reward dependency remains uncertain, so the fee component should be treated as the only presently observable source of LP income; no reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, BOME-SOL carries sharp price-move and liquidity-regime risk, especially when BOME and SOL move in different directions. Emission decay is not the current return driver, but exit timing still matters: a fall in trading activity can reduce fee income while adverse price movement increases inventory divergence.
tollBOME Context
BOME is the memecoin side of this pair and is likely to contribute most of the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity on other Solana venues should be checked separately rather than inferred from this pool's $15.4M; thin external depth can increase slippage during an exit. A BOME move relative to SOL changes the LP's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when fees are accruing.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base-asset side of the pair and generally provides the more established reference market for valuation and execution. Its broader Solana liquidity can help price discovery, but SOL volatility still changes the pool's relative price and LP inventory. If SOL rallies or falls independently of BOME, the resulting rebalancing can leave the LP with less of the outperforming asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOME and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings automatically shift between the two assets as traders use the pool, so the dollar value can differ from simply holding BOME and SOL separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DSUvc5qf5LJHHV5e2tD184ixotSnCnwj7i4jJa4Xsrmt
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- BOME (ukHH6c7m…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
103%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has limited immediate effect because 0.2% is the reward-only component and 97% shows that current yield comes from trading fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, the displayed APR could change without any change in swap volume.
Emission decay has limited immediate effect because 0.2% is the reward-only component and 97% shows that current yield comes from trading fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, the displayed APR could change without any change in swap volume.
The current structure already shows 0.2% from rewards, so an incentive expiry would primarily remove any reward component rather than the fee component. 6.8% would remain tied to trading activity, while total LP income would fall if rewards had been added before expiry.
The current structure already shows 0.2% from rewards, so an incentive expiry would primarily remove any reward component rather than the fee component. 6.8% would remain tied to trading activity, while total LP income would fall if rewards had been added before expiry.
Risk is elevated because BOME can move sharply and its liquidity can change quickly relative to SOL. The pool's $15.4M and $1.2M describe current scale and activity, but they do not cap impermanent loss, slippage, or the risk of an abrupt reduction in fee income.
Risk is elevated because BOME can move sharply and its liquidity can change quickly relative to SOL. The pool's $15.4M and $1.2M describe current scale and activity, but they do not cap impermanent loss, slippage, or the risk of an abrupt reduction in fee income.
Consider exiting when BOME-SOL price divergence becomes difficult to manage, the position leaves its intended range, or fee income falls enough that it no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from 0.08x activity or deterioration in $15.4M would be a concrete review trigger.
Consider exiting when BOME-SOL price divergence becomes difficult to manage, the position leaves its intended range, or fee income falls enough that it no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. For this pool, a sustained decline from 0.08x activity or deterioration in $15.4M would be a concrete review trigger.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and future volume are not available. The current reference is 6.8% in fee income, but actual recovery depends on sustained trading fees, price paths, rebalancing, and exit costs.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and future volume are not available. The current reference is 6.8% in fee income, but actual recovery depends on sustained trading fees, price paths, rebalancing, and exit costs.
