new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, places this pool in an exit posture rather than a marginal hold. Its live verdict is EXIT, driven by an ai_engine exit assessment and a CRITICAL scanner result, with a strong exit signal from multiple sources. The pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so it is not merely being compared with the strongest alternatives. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased relative to TVL, fees rose without emissions, and liquidity remained stable; it would worsen with a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or a sharp deterioration in HABIBI liquidity.
Computed 2026-11-02 14:10 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.49K
Total value locked
$38.38
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a predefined exit rule: if TVL declines while 0.00x remains suppressed, close the position rather than waiting for a reward program to compensate for weak fee flow; avoid a narrow concentrated range until range-performance data is available.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $38.38 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 HABIBI-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13617 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19700 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the HABIBI-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing HABIBI and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your final holdings can contain a different mix of HABIBI and SOL than you deposited, and the fee income may not offset price changes.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of the total generated by fees. A reward timetable is not established for this pool, so emission decay and the duration of any future incentive program cannot be modeled; the current return should be treated as fee-driven rather than reward-supported.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range results are not reported, so the realized cost of holding this position and the efficiency of a concentrated range cannot be quantified from the available record. HABIBI-SOL is a MEMECOIN pool: price shocks, liquidity migration, and rapid sentiment changes can dominate fee income. Emission decay matters because any future incentives may fall faster than trading activity improves, making exit timing important when liquidity or volume deteriorates.
tollHABIBI Context
HABIBI is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price movement directly changes the inventory mix and the LP's exposure relative to simply holding HABIBI and SOL. Liquidity depth for HABIBI elsewhere is not established by this pool record; a sharp move or fragmented liquidity can increase execution impact and amplify impermanent loss. The pool's TVL of $34K should therefore not be treated as evidence of broad HABIBI market depth.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established asset in the pair and represents the benchmark asset against which HABIBI's performance is measured. If HABIBI falls against SOL, the AMM generally leaves the LP with more HABIBI and less SOL; if HABIBI rises sharply, the position tends to sell HABIBI into that strength. SOL volatility can still affect the dollar value of both assets and the LP's fee economics.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing HABIBI and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your final holdings can contain a different mix of HABIBI and SOL than you deposited, and the fee income may not offset price changes.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2ukgjDC99Nk34RfRjWjCoHAuQLtLnz8TLcBrDQk3f2ay
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- HABIBI (864YJRb3…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
20%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated return is currently fee-based at 0.2%. Because no reward schedule is established, future emission decay cannot be quantified, but any new incentives would make the headline APR less durable if they decline without higher trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated return is currently fee-based at 0.2%. Because no reward schedule is established, future emission decay cannot be quantified, but any new incentives would make the headline APR less durable if they decline without higher trading volume.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 0.2% as the relevant yield source. For HABIBI-SOL, that would reinforce the need for organic volume because current turnover is only 0.00x relative to TVL.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 0.2% as the relevant yield source. For HABIBI-SOL, that would reinforce the need for organic volume because current turnover is only 0.00x relative to TVL.
Risk is high because HABIBI can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can migrate quickly, and recent impermanent-loss and range-efficiency results are not reported. The pool also has $34K TVL and $38 in 24-hour volume, limiting the evidence that fees can offset those risks.
Risk is high because HABIBI can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can migrate quickly, and recent impermanent-loss and range-efficiency results are not reported. The pool also has $34K TVL and $38 in 24-hour volume, limiting the evidence that fees can offset those risks.
For this pool, an exit is indicated when TVL falls, volume remains weak, or the pool's live verdict stays at EXIT. A simultaneous decline in fee income and liquidity is a stronger exit signal than a temporary change in the token price alone.
For this pool, an exit is indicated when TVL falls, volume remains weak, or the pool's live verdict stays at EXIT. A simultaneous decline in fee income and liquidity is a stronger exit signal than a temporary change in the token price alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss results are not reported and price paths are unknown. At 0.2% fee APR, fees may offset a modest loss over time, but a large HABIBI move against SOL can take substantially longer than the annualized fee rate suggests.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss results are not reported and price paths are unknown. At 0.2% fee APR, fees may offset a modest loss over time, but a large HABIBI move against SOL can take substantially longer than the annualized fee rate suggests.
