new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 places this pool in a middle range, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 48/100, and Exit at 34/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #967 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. Concretely, that supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the score as evidence of exceptional entry conditions: the fee-funded structure is clearer than an emission-dependent farm, but low recent activity and MEMECOIN exposure limit the case. A material TVL drain, sustained volume deterioration, fee-yield collapse, or a sharp loss of TOOKER liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-08-26 04:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$65.47K
Total value locked
$1.19K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -35.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a volume-based exit rule: withdraw if the pool's rolling volume-to-TVL ratio remains below 0.05x for three consecutive days, or sooner if TOOKER liquidity elsewhere deteriorates; the current reference is 0.02x.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.19K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.97 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 tooker-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2258 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5012 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the tooker-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing TOOKER and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The return is not currently supported by reward emissions, and the value of your deposit can change differently from simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 3.2% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% means the displayed return currently depends on swap activity rather than emissions; however, fee APR will fall if volume declines, and reward dependency is not established for this pool. No reward-expiry countdown is available, so emission decay cannot be used to support a future-yield estimate.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss measurement is not available, so recent divergence loss cannot be quantified from the supplied data. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, and this raydium-amm pool should therefore be assessed through token-price divergence, liquidity depth, and realized volume rather than an observed range statistic. As a MEMECOIN pool, TOOKER-SOL is exposed to sharp price moves, liquidity migration, and rapid sentiment changes; exit timing matters because fee generation can weaken before an LP can unwind without meaningful price impact.
tolltooker Context
TOOKER is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement against SOL directly changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the tokens. The supplied data do not establish TOOKER's liquidity depth elsewhere, making external exit liquidity and abrupt price gaps important due-diligence items.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the base-asset side of the pair and has broader ecosystem liquidity than this individual pool, but that does not remove pair-specific execution risk. If TOOKER falls or rallies sharply against SOL, the AMM rebalances the LP toward the weaker-performing asset, affecting the position's value relative to holding TOOKER and SOL separately.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing TOOKER and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The return is not currently supported by reward emissions, and the value of your deposit can change differently from simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3vGHsKVKNapB4hSapzKNwtiJ6DA8Ytd9SsMFSoAk154B
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- tooker (9EYScpiy…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
10%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
177%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.1%, so emission decay is not presently contributing a reported reduction to the displayed 3.3%. The active yield component is 3.2%, which depends on trading volume and can change independently of emissions.
The current reward component is 0.1%, so emission decay is not presently contributing a reported reduction to the displayed 3.3%. The active yield component is 3.2%, which depends on trading volume and can change independently of emissions.
The pool already reports 0.1% in reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream. LP income would continue to depend on 3.2%, which can decline if TOOKER-SOL trading activity falls.
The pool already reports 0.1% in reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream. LP income would continue to depend on 3.2%, which can decline if TOOKER-SOL trading activity falls.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the pool's limited recent trading activity relative to its TVL, represented by 0.02x. Fees are fully trading-funded at 98%, but they may not offset price divergence or an abrupt TOOKER liquidity exit.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the pool's limited recent trading activity relative to its TVL, represented by 0.02x. Fees are fully trading-funded at 98%, but they may not offset price divergence or an abrupt TOOKER liquidity exit.
Use objective deterioration signals rather than the headline APR alone: consider exiting if volume-to-TVL stays below 0.05x for three consecutive days, TVL drains materially, or TOOKER liquidity and execution quality weaken. An abrupt TOOKER move against SOL is also a reason to reassess before the pool becomes harder to unwind.
Use objective deterioration signals rather than the headline APR alone: consider exiting if volume-to-TVL stays below 0.05x for three consecutive days, TVL drains materially, or TOOKER liquidity and execution quality weaken. An abrupt TOOKER move against SOL is also a reason to reassess before the pool becomes harder to unwind.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 3.2% is variable rather than guaranteed. Fees would need to exceed the position's realized divergence loss, and that outcome depends on future volume, price movement, and exit conditions.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 3.2% is variable rather than guaranteed. Fees would need to exceed the position's realized divergence loss, and that outcome depends on future volume, price movement, and exit conditions.
