new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1029 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, placing it in the upper portion of the ranked set without making it a top-ranked option. The assessment would weaken if $68K drains, fee income collapses, or the current 0.00x activity ratio deteriorates; sustained volume growth, deeper liquidity, or clearer persistence would support a stronger assessment.
Computed 2026-10-19 10:01 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.56K
Total value locked
$38.18
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL/MAX price and review the position whenever the price exits that range; exit or rebalance sooner if pool liquidity falls materially or trading activity no longer supports 0.1% in fee income.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $38.18 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-MAX pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14313 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20627 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MAX liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
You deposit both SOL and MAX into the pool, and traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers. Your final holdings can differ from what you deposited because the two token prices move differently, and MAX may be harder to sell during a downturn.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted APR decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield supported by fees. Reward dependency is not established in the available pool data, so no reliable rewards-expiry timetable can be stated. Fee income will vary with volume, and the current 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates that fee generation is sensitive to continued trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available in the supplied pool data, so the historical cost of price divergence and the time spent in range cannot be quantified here. As a MEMECOIN pool, MAX can reprice sharply against SOL, potentially leaving the position concentrated in the weaker asset after a move. Emission decay is an additional family risk even though the current reward contribution is represented by 0.0%; exit timing should be based on liquidity, trading activity, and relative price movement rather than waiting for an assumed incentive schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the deeper-liquidity asset in this pair and has broader liquidity across Solana markets than MAX. If SOL rises or falls materially relative to MAX, the pool's asset mix changes and fee income may not offset the resulting divergence loss.
tollMAX Context
MAX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and liquidity are likely to be more dependent on token-specific demand than SOL's. A sharp MAX decline can leave an LP with greater effective exposure to MAX, while thin external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
You deposit both SOL and MAX into the pool, and traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers. Your final holdings can differ from what you deposited because the two token prices move differently, and MAX may be harder to sell during a downturn.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4Qgn7AixnZJBwfFL5XmRDBVyzzq9tC6JdDToaKVhPJvz
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MAX (oraim8c9…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
23%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.1% to the total 0.1% APR. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, the reward portion could fall without directly changing trading-fee income.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.1% to the total 0.1% APR. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, the reward portion could fall without directly changing trading-fee income.
Because the current reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees, the quoted return is already primarily fee-supported. If additional incentives are added and later expire, only that reward component would disappear; fee income would continue to depend on pool volume.
Because the current reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees, the quoted return is already primarily fee-supported. If additional incentives are added and later expire, only that reward component would disappear; fee income would continue to depend on pool volume.
The pool combines SOL with MAX, so a sharp MAX move can create substantial divergence between the value of holding both tokens and simply holding them separately. Recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy data are not available here, while $68K liquidity and a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicate that exit conditions should be monitored closely.
The pool combines SOL with MAX, so a sharp MAX move can create substantial divergence between the value of holding both tokens and simply holding them separately. Recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy data are not available here, while $68K liquidity and a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicate that exit conditions should be monitored closely.
For SOL-MAX, review an exit when price leaves your chosen range, when $68K begins to drain, or when trading activity no longer supports 0.1% in fee income. Do not rely on an assumed emissions timetable because reward dependency and lifecycle are not established for this pool.
For SOL-MAX, review an exit when price leaves your chosen range, when $68K begins to drain, or when trading activity no longer supports 0.1% in fee income. Do not rely on an assumed emissions timetable because reward dependency and lifecycle are not established for this pool.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. The relevant income rate is 0.1%, but a price divergence in MAX or SOL can make the recovery period materially longer than a simple fee-only estimate.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. The relevant income rate is 0.1%, but a price divergence in MAX or SOL can make the recovery period materially longer than a simple fee-only estimate.
