new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-MUSTARD below its Enter threshold of 15/100, its Hold threshold of 20/100, and its Exit threshold of 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The score is consistent with the CRITICAL scanner signal, the unopposed strong EXIT signal, and the conflict between an ai_engine hold assessment and the scanner result. Its rank of #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set. The assessment could improve if sustained volume increased fee generation and TVL became more durable; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker MUSTARD liquidity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$73.01K
Total value locked
$59.48
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the position as short-duration liquidity: enter only with a precommitted exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL, pool TVL declines materially, or swap activity falls below its current 0.00x relationship to TVL; do not widen the range to compensate for weak turnover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $59.48 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-Mustard pools
by AI Farmer Score
#936 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1536 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Mustard liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MUSTARD into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up with less value than holding the two tokens separately if their prices move differently.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, making 100% of current yield fee-sourced. Reward dependency is not established, so any future emissions should be treated as uncertain and potentially subject to decay; the current return case rests on trading fees rather than incentives.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so the LP cannot validate realized price-divergence losses or how consistently liquidity would have remained active. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-MUSTARD also carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, while emission decay can remove incentive support and make exit timing more important. Low turnover means fees may not compensate for a sharp move in MUSTARD relative to SOL.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the settlement asset and the deeper-liquidity side of this pair, with substantially broader trading venues elsewhere on Solana. If SOL moves while MUSTARD does not move proportionally, the pool rebalances toward the outperforming asset, creating impermanent-loss exposure for the LP.
tollMustard Context
MUSTARD is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A rapid MUSTARD repricing can increase rebalancing losses, while weakening outside liquidity can make an LP exit more price-sensitive.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MUSTARD into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up with less value than holding the two tokens separately if their prices move differently.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5JbknNv534djG9TeCUMpLevedino2c1WrYB9pqGkyqLe
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Mustard (22Xeo6di…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is split between 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 100% sourced from fees. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, leaving trading volume as the main APR support.
Current yield is split between 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 100% sourced from fees. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall further, leaving trading volume as the main APR support.
Because 0.0% is the current reward-only APR, incentive expiry would not remove the fee component represented by 0.0%, but it could reduce total APR if rewards are later introduced. With 0.00x turnover, fees may not replace lost emissions quickly.
Because 0.0% is the current reward-only APR, incentive expiry would not remove the fee component represented by 0.0%, but it could reduce total APR if rewards are later introduced. With 0.00x turnover, fees may not replace lost emissions quickly.
Risk is high because MUSTARD can move sharply or lose external liquidity while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool also has limited turnover at 0.00x, so fees may provide limited compensation for price divergence and exit slippage.
Risk is high because MUSTARD can move sharply or lose external liquidity while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. The pool also has limited turnover at 0.00x, so fees may provide limited compensation for price divergence and exit slippage.
For SOL-MUSTARD, an exit is warranted if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, TVL contracts, volume weakens, or MUSTARD liquidity deteriorates. The current live verdict is EXIT, so the position should not be treated as open-ended liquidity.
For SOL-MUSTARD, an exit is warranted if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, TVL contracts, volume weakens, or MUSTARD liquidity deteriorates. The current live verdict is EXIT, so the position should not be treated as open-ended liquidity.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, break-even depends on future volume and the size of SOL-MUSTARD price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.0% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, break-even depends on future volume and the size of SOL-MUSTARD price divergence.
