new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 places this pool below the stated entry and hold thresholds and supports the live verdict EXIT. The AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, so the score reflects a weak risk-adjusted case despite fee-only yield. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools; the assessment would improve only with sustained volume, deeper TVL, clearer lifecycle and reward data, and stronger fee generation, while a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-10-23 05:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$32.95K
Total value locked
$84.35
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL status and unopposed strong EXIT signal as the entry filter: if already providing liquidity, set a withdrawal trigger for any further TVL drain or sustained volume below the current $84, rather than waiting for a reward schedule that is not documented.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $84.35 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.21 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-AGIALPHA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#6789 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #11980 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-AGIALPHA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AGIALPHA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the token that performs worse, and the current activity may be too low to produce meaningful income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the stated APR is entirely dependent on swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, so the reward component should not be treated as persistent; in this MEMECOIN pool, any emission decay would remove the reward contribution while leaving fee income dependent on volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized IL and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, AGIALPHA demand, liquidity, and emissions may deteriorate quickly; exit timing matters because a decline in trading activity can reduce fee income before a position is closed. The absence of a documented lifecycle or reward schedule adds uncertainty to planning around emissions and withdrawal timing.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than AGIALPHA. If SOL moves sharply relative to AGIALPHA, the pool rebalances toward the asset that has underperformed, creating inventory divergence and potential impermanent loss for the LP.
tollAGIALPHA Context
AGIALPHA is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp AGIALPHA price move, loss of external liquidity, or fading demand can increase execution risk and leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AGIALPHA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the token that performs worse, and the current activity may be too low to produce meaningful income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8zq3vBuoy66dur6dhrA4aqnrtGg9yZyRAp51BTBpEXj
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- AGIALPHA (tWKHzXd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.4% and total APR is 0.4%. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall away, leaving returns dependent on trading fees and the pool's 0.00x activity.
The reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.4% and total APR is 0.4%. If emissions decay, the reward component can fall away, leaving returns dependent on trading fees and the pool's 0.00x activity.
The reward contribution would fall to zero or remain at its current zero contribution, while fee income would continue only if swaps generate it. With 100% of yield already coming from fees, incentive expiry would not be offset by a separate reward stream.
The reward contribution would fall to zero or remain at its current zero contribution, while fee income would continue only if swaps generate it. With 100% of yield already coming from fees, incentive expiry would not be offset by a separate reward stream.
Risk is elevated because SOL has broad external liquidity while AGIALPHA may depend more heavily on limited venues and changing demand. This pool has $33K of liquidity, $84 in 24-hour volume, and no available recent IL history, so price divergence, shallow exits, and weak fee generation are material concerns.
Risk is elevated because SOL has broad external liquidity while AGIALPHA may depend more heavily on limited venues and changing demand. This pool has $33K of liquidity, $84 in 24-hour volume, and no available recent IL history, so price divergence, shallow exits, and weak fee generation are material concerns.
For SOL-AGIALPHA, an exit is most defensible when the CRITICAL scanner status persists, the unopposed strong EXIT signal remains active, or volume and TVL deteriorate further from $84 and $33K. Do not rely on emissions to justify staying when their duration is not established.
For SOL-AGIALPHA, an exit is most defensible when the CRITICAL scanner status persists, the unopposed strong EXIT signal remains active, or volume and TVL deteriorate further from $84 and $33K. Do not rely on emissions to justify staying when their duration is not established.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current fee income is tied to $84 of volume. With total APR at 0.4% and no reward contribution, recovery could take a long time if SOL and AGIALPHA diverge materially.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current fee income is tied to $84 of volume. With total APR at 0.4% and no reward contribution, recovery could take a long time if SOL and AGIALPHA diverge materially.
