new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. That combination makes the live verdict EXIT: the ai_engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed as a leading alternative within the venue. The assessment would change if sustained volume materially increased relative to TVL, fee APR rose without temporary incentives, liquidity deepened, or the critical scanner finding cleared; a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-09-05 14:38 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$47.64K
Total value locked
$185.41
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat 0.00x as the entry-condition baseline and set a precommitted exit if volume-to-TVL does not improve or if the scanner remains CRITICAL; do not add liquidity solely because the displayed APR is 0.8%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $185.41 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-YAKUB pools
by AI Farmer Score
#654 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1014 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-YAKUB liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and YAKUB into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply relative to each other, and YAKUB may be difficult to sell during a decline.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 0.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield is fee-derived, and reward dependency is not established; with no current reward contribution, emission decay is not presently the main APR risk. The practical constraint is $185 of 24-hour volume against $48K of liquidity, reflected in the 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range behavior are not reported, so the realized loss profile and range utilization cannot be validated from the available data. SOL-YAKUB is a MEMECOIN pool: YAKUB-specific price shocks, thin exit liquidity, and rapid attention decay can create losses that fees may not offset. Emission decay is a family risk if incentives are added later, but the current reward APR is 0.0%.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than YAKUB. If SOL trends sharply against YAKUB, the pool rebalances toward the appreciating asset, leaving the LP with less of that asset than a passive hold and exposing the position to relative-price impermanent loss.
tollYAKUB Context
YAKUB is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more venue-dependent than SOL's. A rapid YAKUB repricing can produce large inventory shifts and difficult exits; a decline in YAKUB can leave the LP holding a greater share of the weaker asset while fee income remains tied to limited volume.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and YAKUB into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply relative to each other, and YAKUB may be difficult to sell during a decline.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CyFewMeEtA5qvPFFnEDVJ3XhiNCEFzWJxQm8qDjkzVvC
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- YAKUB (7iagMTDP…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
50%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the displayed APR of 0.8% is not currently dependent on active emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on $185 of trading volume.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, so the displayed APR of 0.8% is not currently dependent on active emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, only the reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on $185 of trading volume.
There is no current reward contribution shown, with 0.0% attributed to rewards, so incentive expiry would not remove a presently visible reward stream. The remaining return would be 0.8%, generated from trading fees and constrained by the 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
There is no current reward contribution shown, with 0.0% attributed to rewards, so incentive expiry would not remove a presently visible reward stream. The remaining return would be 0.8%, generated from trading fees and constrained by the 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
Risk is elevated because YAKUB can experience abrupt price moves and thinner liquidity than SOL, while the pool has $48K in liquidity and $185 in 24-hour volume. Impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported, so the position's past protection against price divergence cannot be quantified.
Risk is elevated because YAKUB can experience abrupt price moves and thinner liquidity than SOL, while the pool has $48K in liquidity and $185 in 24-hour volume. Impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported, so the position's past protection against price divergence cannot be quantified.
For SOL-YAKUB, an exit is consistent with the live EXIT and the CRITICAL scanner state, particularly if volume-to-TVL remains at 0.00x or deteriorates. Reassess immediately after a sharp YAKUB move, a liquidity drain, or a decline in fee APR below 0.8%.
For SOL-YAKUB, an exit is consistent with the live EXIT and the CRITICAL scanner state, particularly if volume-to-TVL remains at 0.00x or deteriorates. Reassess immediately after a sharp YAKUB move, a liquidity drain, or a decline in fee APR below 0.8%.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and volume is only $185 against $48K of liquidity. The fee-only return is 0.8%, so recovery depends on sustained trading fees and a reversal or stabilization of the SOL-YAKUB price divergence.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and volume is only $185 against $48K of liquidity. The fee-only return is 0.8%, so recovery depends on sustained trading fees and a reversal or stabilization of the SOL-YAKUB price divergence.
