new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. That produces a live verdict of EXIT, consistent with ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed as a leading venue in that set. A sustained increase in fee-generating volume, deeper TVL, clearer reward conditions, and removal of the CRITICAL signal could change the assessment; a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-09 07:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$53.70K
Total value locked
$114.99
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a broad initial range because current tick-in-range data is unavailable, then rebalance only when the position leaves the active range or swap flow deteriorates; treat a continuing CRITICAL scanner state or a material TVL drain as a hard exit trigger.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $114.99 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-Duo pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13982 of 83074 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19884 of 135723
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Duo liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DUO into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of the swap fees. The value of your deposit can change as SOL and DUO move differently, and the current figures indicate that fees, not extra token rewards, are the relevant source of return.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 0.2% decomposes into fee APR of 0.2% and reward APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the quoted yield depends on trading fees rather than emissions. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established in the supplied data, meaning future reward decay cannot be quantified.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are unavailable, so realized price-divergence damage and active-range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-DUO is exposed to abrupt DUO repricing, shallow-liquidity effects, and rapid changes in swap flow. Any emissions may decay without warning, making exit timing important when fee volume weakens or incentives change.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than DUO. SOL price movement against DUO changes the pool's asset mix; a sustained divergence can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset even when the fee APR remains unchanged.
tollDuo Context
DUO is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's. A sharp DUO move can increase inventory imbalance and withdrawal slippage, while a collapse in DUO activity can reduce fee generation without requiring the pool's quoted APR to update immediately.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DUO into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of the swap fees. The value of your deposit can change as SOL and DUO move differently, and the current figures indicate that fees, not extra token rewards, are the relevant source of return.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F3ZfYgWauCZRfwDs9ijKkqo4t83Waxqc4cz9mUsJpNWr
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Duo (KFTSxPQx…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
17%
APR
0%
APR
17%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 0.2%, with reward APR of 0.0% and fee APR of 0.2%. Because the reward schedule is not established and the fee sustainability figure is 100%, any emission decay would reduce the reward component without a demonstrated fee increase to offset it.
The current total APR is 0.2%, with reward APR of 0.0% and fee APR of 0.2%. Because the reward schedule is not established and the fee sustainability figure is 100%, any emission decay would reduce the reward component without a demonstrated fee increase to offset it.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall away and the remaining return would depend on swap fees, currently represented by 0.2%. With fee sustainability at 100% and 24-hour volume of $115, the post-incentive economics should be evaluated as a fee-only pool rather than assumed to retain 0.2%.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall away and the remaining return would depend on swap fees, currently represented by 0.2%. With fee sustainability at 100% and 24-hour volume of $115, the post-incentive economics should be evaluated as a fee-only pool rather than assumed to retain 0.2%.
Risk is elevated because DUO can move sharply or lose liquidity relative to SOL, creating inventory imbalance and difficult exits. Recent impermanent-loss and active-range data are unavailable, while the pool has a EXIT verdict and a CRITICAL scanner signal.
Risk is elevated because DUO can move sharply or lose liquidity relative to SOL, creating inventory imbalance and difficult exits. Recent impermanent-loss and active-range data are unavailable, while the pool has a EXIT verdict and a CRITICAL scanner signal.
For SOL-DUO, an exit is defensible if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, TVL drains, swap volume weakens, or the position leaves its active range and rebalancing no longer has a fee rationale. Do not rely on 0.2% alone while the pool's volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.00x.
For SOL-DUO, an exit is defensible if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, TVL drains, swap volume weakens, or the position leaves its active range and rebalancing no longer has a fee rationale. Do not rely on 0.2% alone while the pool's volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.00x.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. At total APR of 0.2%, the relevant comparison is against the size and persistence of price divergence, not a fixed recovery timeline.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. At total APR of 0.2%, the relevant comparison is against the size and persistence of price divergence, not a fixed recovery timeline.
