Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 46% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 with Enter 40/100 / Hold 50/100 / Exit 50/100 produces the live verdict REDUCE, with ai_engine=hold as the stated driver. Its rank of #1346 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it in a middle portion of the tracked set rather than among the strongest pools, consistent with fee-funded yield but limited turnover and small liquidity. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee income collapses; it would improve if sustained organic volume increased without a corresponding rise in liquidity or price-dislocation risk.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.44K
Total value locked
$21.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Avoid a narrow initial tick range while range data is unavailable; use a range wide enough to tolerate normal SOL/HIBER volatility, and reassess or exit if 24-hour volume falls materially below $21 or the pool's liquidity begins to drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $21.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-HIBER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14015 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20123 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-HIBER liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and HIBER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price change between the two tokens can leave you with a less favorable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.1% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on swap activity rather than current farm emissions; no reward-duration assumption is available for this pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and current tick-in-range coverage is also not reported, so the realized range and price-divergence risk cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, HIBER can experience abrupt liquidity withdrawal and price dislocation against SOL; any future emissions may decay, while exit timing matters because leaving after volume or incentives weaken can crystallize losses and reduce fee recovery.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than HIBER. SOL price moves change the pool's relative price, so a sharp SOL move against HIBER can increase the LP's inventory imbalance and impermanent-loss exposure even when swap fees accrue.
tollHIBER Context
HIBER is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to determine most of the pool's idiosyncratic liquidity and price risk. Its liquidity elsewhere may be thinner than SOL's, so abrupt HIBER repricing or weak exit liquidity can make rebalancing and withdrawal more costly for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and HIBER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a large price change between the two tokens can leave you with a less favorable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F738UFUJZwaJvRoNJKotySDm83sL4UZ81Jxrd7YPRcX6
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- HIBER (FHKiJEg2…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.1%. Because 100% of stated yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if future incentives are added; any such decline would reduce total APR without necessarily changing trading-fee income.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.1%. Because 100% of stated yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly matter if future incentives are added; any such decline would reduce total APR without necessarily changing trading-fee income.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so expiration would not remove the fee-only component of 0.1%. If incentives are introduced later, the pool's post-expiry return would depend primarily on trading volume and fee generation.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so expiration would not remove the fee-only component of 0.1%. If incentives are introduced later, the pool's post-expiry return would depend primarily on trading volume and fee generation.
Risk is elevated because HIBER is a memecoin with potentially unstable price and exit liquidity, while SOL has deeper liquidity elsewhere. The pool's small TVL of $34K and turnover of 0.00x indicate that withdrawals and price changes should be assessed against the pool's limited depth.
Risk is elevated because HIBER is a memecoin with potentially unstable price and exit liquidity, while SOL has deeper liquidity elsewhere. The pool's small TVL of $34K and turnover of 0.00x indicate that withdrawals and price changes should be assessed against the pool's limited depth.
For SOL-HIBER, an exit signal would be sustained volume deterioration below $21, visible TVL erosion, or a HIBER price move that pushes the position outside your intended range. Exiting before liquidity and fee generation deteriorate can be preferable to waiting for emissions or speculative demand to return.
For SOL-HIBER, an exit signal would be sustained volume deterioration below $21, visible TVL erosion, or a HIBER price move that pushes the position outside your intended range. Exiting before liquidity and fee generation deteriorate can be preferable to waiting for emissions or speculative demand to return.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery would depend on 0.1%, but actual break-even also depends on SOL/HIBER price divergence, rebalancing, withdrawal costs, and future volume.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery would depend on 0.1%, but actual break-even also depends on SOL/HIBER price divergence, rebalancing, withdrawal costs, and future volume.
