SAROS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $28.02K
- APR
- 2.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $24.13K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- 3G2itp6E…Gtom · observed 2026-07-27
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 44/100 places this pool in a mixed, below-midfield position, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 51/100, and Exit at 30/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #542 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools. That indicates the system does not identify a clear entry edge, but also does not assign an outright exit signal; the assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell, or fee yield collapsed, and could improve if liquidity and sustained fee generation increased without a corresponding rise in SAROS volatility.
Computed 2026-07-27 00:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$28.02K
Total value locked
$24.13K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -10.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately defined active range and set an exit or rebalance rule for any move outside that range; reassess immediately if volume-to-liquidity falls materially below 0.86x or if fee generation no longer supports 2.1%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $24.13K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.41 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SAROS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#660 of 7739 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8334 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SAROS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SAROS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the weaker-performing asset, and the small pool size can make withdrawals or price execution more difficult.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied data, so the fee component is the measurable basis for the current APR. Because the reward component is 0.0%, any future emission change would have limited direct effect unless the fee or reward accounting changes.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently inside the active tick range are not reported, limiting evidence about realized range performance. As a MEMECOIN pool, SAROS-USDC is exposed to abrupt SAROS price moves, one-sided inventory accumulation, and adverse execution when liquidity is thin. Emission decay and exit timing still matter even with no measured reward contribution: an LP should reassess if trading activity falls, liquidity drains, or the token's market loses depth.
tollSAROS Context
SAROS is the volatile side of this pair and supplies the pool's primary directional and impermanent-loss exposure. The supplied pool metrics do not establish SAROS's liquidity depth elsewhere, so its broader exit conditions should be verified independently. A sharp SAROS move can leave an LP holding more of the declining asset while fees may not offset the inventory change.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and accounting asset, providing a relatively stable reference against which SAROS price changes are measured. USDC generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a memecoin, but that does not remove the concentration and execution risk of this specific pool. When SAROS rises or falls sharply, the LP position can shift away from its initial SAROS-USDC balance.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SAROS and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the weaker-performing asset, and the small pool size can make withdrawals or price execution more difficult.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3G2itp6ERsvSs2UhfYMTEdX21uxVdKc71ipGQG8oGtom
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SAROS (SarosY6V…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-clmm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 2.1% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. Since the reward component is 0.0%, emission decay would have little direct effect unless the reward accounting changes, but lower trading activity would reduce the fee component.
The current APR is split between 2.1% in trading fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. Since the reward component is 0.0%, emission decay would have little direct effect unless the reward accounting changes, but lower trading activity would reduce the fee component.
The reward component would fall toward zero if incentives end, but the supplied figure is already 0.0%. The remaining return would depend primarily on trading fees, currently represented by 2.1%, rather than emissions.
The reward component would fall toward zero if incentives end, but the supplied figure is already 0.0%. The remaining return would depend primarily on trading fees, currently represented by 2.1%, rather than emissions.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin-only or major-token pair because SAROS can move sharply and the pool has limited liquidity at $28K. Fees of 2.1% may not compensate for impermanent loss, thin execution, or a rapid decline in SAROS demand.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin-only or major-token pair because SAROS can move sharply and the pool has limited liquidity at $28K. Fees of 2.1% may not compensate for impermanent loss, thin execution, or a rapid decline in SAROS demand.
Use a predefined range breach, a sustained decline in fee-producing volume, or a material TVL drain as an exit trigger. For SAROS-USDC, reassess when the pool can no longer support 2.1% or when holding the resulting SAROS inventory is no longer acceptable.
Use a predefined range breach, a sustained decline in fee-producing volume, or a material TVL drain as an exit trigger. For SAROS-USDC, reassess when the pool can no longer support 2.1% or when holding the resulting SAROS inventory is no longer acceptable.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported and SAROS volatility is variable. If conditions stayed constant, fee-only recovery would depend on 2.1%, but that estimate would exclude further price divergence, range changes, and compounding.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported and SAROS volatility is variable. If conditions stayed constant, fee-only recovery would depend on 2.1%, but that estimate would exclude further price divergence, range changes, and compounding.
