USDC-USDTon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $1.12M
- APR
- 1.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $442.65K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 4fuUiYxT…y4T4 · observed 2026-08-23
Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 54% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 59/100 places the pool between its Enter score of 53/100, Hold score of 66/100, and Exit score of 15/100 thresholds, with the live verdict at HOLD. Its #58-of-2506 rank among orca-whirlpool pools makes it relatively well positioned within that pool set, but the score is not a guarantee of stablecoin solvency or future fee flow. The ai_engine=enter driver has not yet converted the live assessment because promotion to ENTER is pending its dwell requirement. A sustained TVL drain, material collapse in fee APR or volume, persistent depeg, or deterioration in execution conditions would change the assessment.
Computed 2026-08-23 10:33 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.12M
Total value locked
$442.65K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range centered on the USDC-USDT peg only if you can monitor it; rebalance when either token trades persistently outside that range or the position becomes materially one-sided, and exit rather than re-center if the depeg persists.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $442.65K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $44.27 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 34 USDC-USDT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#87 of 13395 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #972 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-USDT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both USDC and USDT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a lasting difference between the two stablecoins can leave you holding more of the weaker one.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 1.5% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 99% means trading fees account for the reported yield, while reward dependency remains undetermined; no separate reward-duration assumption is used here.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so the current seven-day path and concentration exposure cannot be quantified from these metrics. This is a STABLECOIN pool, but it still carries depeg risk: a USDC-USDT price divergence can create inventory imbalance and adverse selection, particularly when liquidity is concentrated near the peg. It is not equivalent to a single-sided USDC or USDT position, which avoids holding both assets in an AMM range.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is one side of the pool and generally has substantial liquidity across Solana venues, supporting swap routing and external exit options. If USDC falls below its intended peg, the pool can accumulate USDC as arbitrageurs trade against the range, leaving the LP with greater exposure to the impaired asset.
tollUSDT Context
USDT supplies the other side of the pool and also has liquidity across Solana markets, though venue-specific depth and redemption access differ. A USDT discount or loss of liquidity can similarly shift the LP inventory toward USDT while fee income may not compensate for the price divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both USDC and USDT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but a lasting difference between the two stablecoins can leave you holding more of the weaker one.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4fuUiYxTQ6QCrdSq9ouBYcTM7bqSwYTSyLueGZLTy4T4
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- USDT (Es9vMFrz…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both assets are intended to track the US dollar, but either can trade below its target because of issuer, reserve, liquidity, or market-structure stress. With TVL of $1.1M and 24-hour volume of $443K, the pool remains exposed to arbitrage and inventory shifts if either stablecoin depegs.
Both assets are intended to track the US dollar, but either can trade below its target because of issuer, reserve, liquidity, or market-structure stress. With TVL of $1.1M and 24-hour volume of $443K, the pool remains exposed to arbitrage and inventory shifts if either stablecoin depegs.
This pool reports fee-only APR of 1.5%, but a direct comparison requires the specific USDC lending rate, utilization, collateral terms, and lender-side risks. Unlike single-sided lending, this position also carries two-asset depeg exposure and concentrated-range management requirements.
This pool reports fee-only APR of 1.5%, but a direct comparison requires the specific USDC lending rate, utilization, collateral terms, and lender-side risks. Unlike single-sided lending, this position also carries two-asset depeg exposure and concentrated-range management requirements.
It is not risk-free: the reported total APR is 1.5%, with 99% and no separate reward stream represented by 0.0%. Risks include USDC or USDT depeg, smart-contract and venue risk, concentrated liquidity exposure, and fee income falling with volume.
It is not risk-free: the reported total APR is 1.5%, with 99% and no separate reward stream represented by 0.0%. Risks include USDC or USDT depeg, smart-contract and venue risk, concentrated liquidity exposure, and fee income falling with volume.
Arbitrage can move the pool's inventory toward the stablecoin trading below its target, so your position may become concentrated in that asset while its dollar value falls. The pool's fee income, currently represented by 1.5%, does not remove that mark-to-market or redemption risk.
Arbitrage can move the pool's inventory toward the stablecoin trading below its target, so your position may become concentrated in that asset while its dollar value falls. The pool's fee income, currently represented by 1.5%, does not remove that mark-to-market or redemption risk.
Use price and inventory conditions rather than a fixed calendar: review the position whenever either stablecoin moves outside your selected range or the LP becomes one-sided. With recent tick-in-range and seven-day IL readings unavailable, tighter monitoring is appropriate until those observations are available.
Use price and inventory conditions rather than a fixed calendar: review the position whenever either stablecoin moves outside your selected range or the LP becomes one-sided. With recent tick-in-range and seven-day IL readings unavailable, tighter monitoring is appropriate until those observations are available.
