new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 54/100 with Enter 50/100, Hold 60/100, and Exit 22/100 supports retaining an existing position more than initiating a new one, consistent with the live verdict HOLD and the ai_engine=hold driver. The pool ranks #186 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools, placing it above many alternatives but not making it a top-ranked venue. The assessment would improve if fee volume and TVL increased without a corresponding rise in price or range risk; it would deteriorate with a TVL drain, lower trading fees, a collapsing APR, or evidence that FARTCOIN liquidity is becoming difficult to exit.
Computed 2026-08-21 20:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$151.10K
Total value locked
$156.58K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up83.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 65.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range no wider than the price band you are prepared to actively manage, and rebalance or exit when the market reaches the outer fifth of that range without a clear return catalyst; do not add simply because the displayed APR remains unchanged.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 83.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 60.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $156.58K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $290.83 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 Fartcoin-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#361 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1791 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the Fartcoin-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FARTCOIN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and less value than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into 60.7% from trading fees and 22.7% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 73%, so the current return depends on trading activity rather than an active reward stream; reward-dependency status is not established. Fee income can decline if volume or liquidity falls, and the displayed APR should not be treated as fixed.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, FARTCOIN-SOL is exposed to abrupt FARTCOIN price moves, thinner exit liquidity, and adverse selection when volatility moves price outside the chosen range. Emission decay is not the current yield risk because the displayed reward component is absent, but exit timing still matters if fee volume weakens or FARTCOIN demand contracts.
tollFartcoin Context
FARTCOIN is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement is the main source of divergence risk for an LP. The supplied pool data does not establish FARTCOIN's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp move or fragmented liquidity can increase execution loss and make a concentrated position harder to unwind. Relative FARTCOIN strength can also push the position toward one-sided inventory, while weakness can leave the LP holding more FARTCOIN.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset paired against FARTCOIN and provides the non-memecoin side of the position. Liquidity depth for SOL elsewhere is not quantified here, although SOL price moves still change the pair's relative price and can move the position through its range. SOL strength against FARTCOIN generally increases FARTCOIN inventory for the LP, while FARTCOIN strength tends to increase SOL inventory.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FARTCOIN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset and less value than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6wJ7W3oHj7ex6MVFp2o26NSof3aey7U8Brs8E371WCXA
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- Fartcoin (9BB6NFEc…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 22.7%, while fee income is 60.7% and total APR is 83.4%. Because the displayed return is fee-led, emission decay is not currently reducing a listed reward component, but future incentives cannot be assumed.
The current reward-only APR is 22.7%, while fee income is 60.7% and total APR is 83.4%. Because the displayed return is fee-led, emission decay is not currently reducing a listed reward component, but future incentives cannot be assumed.
There is no current reward contribution shown, so expiration would not remove a listed reward component from the present APR. Trading-fee income would remain the relevant source, currently represented by 60.7%, but it would vary with volume and liquidity.
There is no current reward contribution shown, so expiration would not remove a listed reward component from the present APR. Trading-fee income would remain the relevant source, currently represented by 60.7%, but it would vary with volume and liquidity.
The main risks are abrupt FARTCOIN price moves, impermanent loss, concentrated-range exposure, and limited exit liquidity during a selloff. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so this pool's recent behavior cannot be used to quantify those risks.
The main risks are abrupt FARTCOIN price moves, impermanent loss, concentrated-range exposure, and limited exit liquidity during a selloff. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so this pool's recent behavior cannot be used to quantify those risks.
Consider exiting when FARTCOIN liquidity deteriorates, fee volume no longer justifies the range-management risk, or price repeatedly reaches the range boundary. For this pool, a falling TVL, weaker fee APR than 60.7%, or a deteriorating live verdict would be concrete warning signals.
Consider exiting when FARTCOIN liquidity deteriorates, fee volume no longer justifies the range-management risk, or price repeatedly reaches the range boundary. For this pool, a falling TVL, weaker fee APR than 60.7%, or a deteriorating live verdict would be concrete warning signals.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and 60.7% is a variable fee rate rather than a guaranteed return. Break-even requires comparing realized fees with the position's actual divergence loss and any rebalancing or exit costs.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and 60.7% is a variable fee rate rather than a guaranteed return. Break-even requires comparing realized fees with the position's actual divergence loss and any rebalancing or exit costs.
