AAPLx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $239.26K
- APR
- 29.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $63.66K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- CKwJZwm7…uF8y · observed 2026-10-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. With verdict EXIT, an unopposed strong EXIT signal, and a rank of #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, the model is treating this as a pool to leave rather than maintain despite its fee-generated APR. The assessment would change if fee volume remained durable while risk signals improved; conversely, a TVL drain, a collapse in trading volume, or a sharp yield decline would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-22 11:38 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$239.26K
Total value locked
$63.66K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up29.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 147.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a deliberately narrow initial tick range and set an automatic review or exit trigger for a sustained loss of fee activity or a material drop in 0.27x; do not leave the position unattended through a range exit.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 29.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 26.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $63.66K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $159.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 11 AAPLx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#826 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5347 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the AAPLx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing AAPLX and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up holding more of whichever token underperforms, and the fee income may not compensate for that price difference.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 26.0% from trading fees and 3.7% from rewards. 88% means the displayed APR is currently dependent on swap activity rather than token emissions. Reward duration is not established, so projected APR should not be treated as a fixed forward rate.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and the seven-day share of liquidity remaining inside the selected ticks is also unavailable, limiting direct measurement of range efficiency. As a MEMECOIN pool, AAPLX-USDC carries emission-decay and exit-timing risk: if attention, volume, or liquidity falls, fee income can contract quickly while AAPLX price movement against USDC can increase inventory imbalance. The fee-only structure removes reward-emission risk from the current yield mix but does not remove token or range risk.
tollAAPLx Context
AAPLX is the volatile, memecoin-side asset in this pair, so its price movement determines whether the position accumulates AAPLX or USDC as arbitrage rebalances the pool. Separate liquidity depth for AAPLX is not established here; thin external liquidity would make exits more price-sensitive and could amplify divergence from the pool price. A sharp AAPLX move against USDC can therefore raise impermanent-loss exposure even while fees accrue.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the comparatively stable quote asset and the accounting reference for the pool's dollar value. Its external depth is not quantified here, so the relevant comparison is whether USDC liquidity elsewhere can absorb AAPLX flows without substantial price impact. When AAPLX falls, the position tends to hold more AAPLX; when AAPLX rises, it tends to hold more USDC.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing AAPLX and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up holding more of whichever token underperforms, and the fee income may not compensate for that price difference.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CKwJZwm7oj3nu4653N1EpDrqXbXAYXoPFiPeEnLouF8y
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- AAPLx (XsbEhLAt…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 3.7%, while fee income is 26.0% and total APR is 29.6%. Because the displayed yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently account for the APR, but any future incentive program would need separate duration and decay assumptions.
The current reward component is 3.7%, while fee income is 26.0% and total APR is 29.6%. Because the displayed yield is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently account for the APR, but any future incentive program would need separate duration and decay assumptions.
The current reward APR is 3.7%, so expiration would not remove a stated reward stream from the present calculation. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently shown as 26.0%, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
The current reward APR is 3.7%, so expiration would not remove a stated reward stream from the present calculation. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently shown as 26.0%, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is elevated because AAPLX can move sharply against USDC, and a MEMECOIN pool is exposed to rapid changes in attention, volume, and exit liquidity. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the position cannot be evaluated using a recent realized-loss or range-efficiency history.
Risk is elevated because AAPLX can move sharply against USDC, and a MEMECOIN pool is exposed to rapid changes in attention, volume, and exit liquidity. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the position cannot be evaluated using a recent realized-loss or range-efficiency history.
For this pool, an exit review is warranted when fee-producing volume weakens materially, TVL drains, AAPLX liquidity deteriorates, or the position leaves its chosen tick range. The current verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a clearer deterioration is not required by the present signal.
For this pool, an exit review is warranted when fee-producing volume weakens materially, TVL drains, AAPLX liquidity deteriorates, or the position leaves its chosen tick range. The current verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a clearer deterioration is not required by the present signal.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. Any break-even estimate must compare the position's actual fee accrual, 26.0%, with the realized price divergence between AAPLX and USDC.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. Any break-even estimate must compare the position's actual fee accrual, 26.0%, with the realized price divergence between AAPLX and USDC.
