DUSD-USDTon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $142.06K
- APR
- 1.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $73.67K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- DbsTAmxn…cGGm · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 47/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 42/100 and Hold score of 54/100, while the Exit score is 26/100. The live verdict is HOLD: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by a CRITICAL scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. Its rank of #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set, not a standalone safety assessment. The assessment would improve if trading volume and fee generation rose sustainably, liquidity became more persistent, and the scanner cleared; a TVL drain, lower fee income, or further emission deterioration would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$142.06K
Total value locked
$73.67K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the live EXIT verdict, use a narrow, actively monitored range and set an automatic review or exit trigger when the position leaves that range, pool TVL drains materially, or the verdict remains EXIT while fee income does not improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $73.67K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $7.37 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 DUSD-USDT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1089 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9940 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DUSD-USDT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DUSD and USDT into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more DUSD after its price falls, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than reward-based.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the reported yield is fee-derived, so returns depend on sustained swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established for this pool, and the current reward component does not contribute to the displayed APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and in-range history are not available, so the pool's realized price-risk behavior cannot be assessed from those measures. DUSD's memecoin classification adds emission-decay and exit-timing risk: if incentives change or liquidity leaves, fee income may not compensate for adverse price movement, and exiting a concentrated position can be harder when depth is limited. The low Vol/TVL ratio also makes execution and range management relevant risks.
tollDUSD Context
DUSD is the pool's memecoin-side asset, paired against USDT for swaps and liquidity provision. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a DUSD price move changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding DUSD and USDT. A sharp fall, depeg, or loss of market demand would also reduce the practical value of the LP position.
tollUSDT Context
USDT is the dollar-referenced quote asset in this pair and provides the accounting reference for DUSD's price. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not quantified here, but USDT normally supplies the more stable side of the position. If DUSD moves materially against USDT, the LP accumulates more of the falling asset and less of the rising one.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DUSD and USDT into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more DUSD after its price falls, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than reward-based.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DbsTAmxnFAWRvigSks6DahpKi5Ypz3w2BMKEejTJcGGm
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- DUSD (DUSDt4Ae…)
- Token B
- USDT (Es9vMFrz…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.5% and accounts for 99% of yield. Further emission decay would therefore have little direct effect on the displayed APR unless rewards are introduced or changed; fee returns would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.5% and accounts for 99% of yield. Further emission decay would therefore have little direct effect on the displayed APR unless rewards are introduced or changed; fee returns would still depend on trading volume.
Because the reward component is currently 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful displayed reward stream under the current figures. The remaining return would come from 1.5%, which can fall if swaps do not generate enough fees.
Because the reward component is currently 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful displayed reward stream under the current figures. The remaining return would come from 1.5%, which can fall if swaps do not generate enough fees.
Risk is elevated by DUSD's memecoin classification, uncertain liquidity persistence, and the possibility of sharp price moves against USDT. With TVL at $142K and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.52x, fee income may not provide much compensation for impermanent loss or difficult execution.
Risk is elevated by DUSD's memecoin classification, uncertain liquidity persistence, and the possibility of sharp price moves against USDT. With TVL at $142K and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.52x, fee income may not provide much compensation for impermanent loss or difficult execution.
For this pool, an exit review is warranted while the live verdict remains HOLD, especially if TVL declines, fee activity weakens, DUSD loses demand, or the position moves outside its intended range. The unopposed strong EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner result argue against waiting for emissions to improve the position.
For this pool, an exit review is warranted while the live verdict remains HOLD, especially if TVL declines, fee activity weakens, DUSD loses demand, or the position moves outside its intended range. The unopposed strong EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner result argue against waiting for emissions to improve the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. In principle, fees of 1.5% must exceed the position's impermanent loss, rebalancing costs, and exit costs; the reward component of 0.0% does not materially shorten that period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. In principle, fees of 1.5% must exceed the position's impermanent loss, rebalancing costs, and exit costs; the reward component of 0.0% does not materially shorten that period.
