WealthVille
KLED
K
SOL
S

KLED-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $83.02K
APR
192.6% APR
24h Volume
$71.72K 24h vol
Pool address
Diy8bJcV…HyKv · observed 2026-10-10
54D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 54% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter50

new capital

Hold60

keep position

Exit21

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 54/100 gives KLED-SOL a live HOLD assessment, with Enter at 50/100, Hold at 60/100, and Exit at 21/100. The pool ranks #51 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, while the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold; this supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the score as a reason to enter without further checks. A TVL drain, a collapse in fee APR, materially lower volume relative to liquidity, or evidence of worsening execution conditions would change the assessment toward exit; durable fee volume and stable liquidity would support the current hold view.

Computed 2026-10-10 19:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$83.02K

Total value locked

$71.72K

24h volume

×0.9 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

192.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 132.3%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 25m agoTVL ↑16.8%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

tips_and_updates

Use a range that can be monitored actively rather than leaving the position unattended, and rebalance when the market price exits that range. Treat a sustained condition where 24-hour volume falls below pool TVL as an exit review trigger, because the current fee case depends on trading activity.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR192.6%——
Fee APR107.5%——
Volume$71.72K——
Fees Earned$331.63——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
145.8%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−13.5%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
132.3%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.86x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0040
Fee APR Sustainability
56% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#2 of 9 KLED-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#462 of 4136 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #2293 of 135723

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the KLED-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing KLED and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves or thin liquidity can leave you holding more of the asset that has fallen relative to the other.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Reported yield decomposes into 107.5% fee APR and 85.1% reward APR, with 56% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no active reward contribution in the reported APR, so the headline figure depends on trading activity rather than a disclosed emissions schedule.

shieldRisk Assessment

A recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, KLED-SOL carries abrupt-demand, price-gap, and liquidity-thinning risk; any future emissions should be treated as decay-sensitive, and exiting after volatility has already reduced depth can increase execution loss.

tollKLED Context

KLED is the memecoin side of this pair and supplies the pool's most concentrated asset-specific risk. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp KLED move against SOL can leave an LP with a larger share of the weaker-performing asset and increase rebalancing pressure.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the more established base asset in the pair, but its price movement still determines the pool's relative-value path. SOL appreciation or depreciation against KLED changes the inventory an LP holds, while broad SOL volatility can push price outside the active range and reduce fee capture.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing KLED and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price moves or thin liquidity can leave you holding more of the asset that has fallen relative to the other.

token

Token Details

KLED
KLEDKLEDAISolana
Explorer

KLEDAI (KLED) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
Diy8bJcVUqwEtXaRXBADEKBYSpH8MJNwmJ9vodMsHyKv
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
KLED (1zJX5gRn…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The reported reward APR is 85.1%, while fee APR is 107.5% and 56% of yield comes from fees. Emission decay therefore does not currently account for the reported return, but any future rewards should be treated as temporary and subject to decline.

The reported reward APR is 85.1%, while fee APR is 107.5% and 56% of yield comes from fees. Emission decay therefore does not currently account for the reported return, but any future rewards should be treated as temporary and subject to decline.

The reported reward contribution is already 85.1%, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a current reward component from the stated APR. The remaining yield case is 107.5%, which depends on continued trading volume rather than emissions.

The reported reward contribution is already 85.1%, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a current reward component from the stated APR. The remaining yield case is 107.5%, which depends on continued trading volume rather than emissions.

Risk is elevated because KLED can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has $83K of liquidity and 0.86x volume relative to TVL. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available, so the size of realized LP drag cannot be established from this data.

Risk is elevated because KLED can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has $83K of liquidity and 0.86x volume relative to TVL. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available, so the size of realized LP drag cannot be established from this data.

Review an exit when KLED volatility pushes price outside the active range, when 24-hour volume falls below pool TVL, or when fee APR declines enough that it no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. In this pool, those checks matter because fee income is the entire reported yield source.

Review an exit when KLED volatility pushes price outside the active range, when 24-hour volume falls below pool TVL, or when fee APR declines enough that it no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. In this pool, those checks matter because fee income is the entire reported yield source.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without recent impermanent-loss history, price-path data, and realized fee accruals. 107.5% is an annualized rate rather than a guarantee, so compare actual fees earned with the position's inventory divergence before assuming recovery.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without recent impermanent-loss history, price-path data, and realized fee accruals. 107.5% is an annualized rate rather than a guarantee, so compare actual fees earned with the position's inventory divergence before assuming recovery.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights