LEOS-DGUon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $57.25K
- APR
- 0.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $13.48 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- Eu9kcoMt…rZ1W · observed 2026-10-22
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 45% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 assigns Enter 40/100, Hold 52/100, and Exit 50/100, with the live verdict at REDUCE and the stated driver ai_engine=hold. Ranked #305 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, this is a relatively high-ranked pool within the listed set, but the ranking does not remove its fee-dependence or memecoin risk. The hold assessment would weaken if TVL drained, trading activity deteriorated, or the fee-derived yield collapsed; it would strengthen only if durable volume and usable liquidity improved without a corresponding rise in price or range risk.
Computed 2026-10-19 11:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$57.25K
Total value locked
$13.48
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a monitored range, and rebalance or exit if the LEOS-DGU price approaches a range boundary or if 0.00x remains near zero while TVL begins to drain; do not rely on rewards to compensate for inactivity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $13.48 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.13 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 LEOS-DGU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#118 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #907 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the LEOS-DGU liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing LEOS and DGU into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings change as prices move, and because this pool is a memecoin pair, low activity or a sharp price move can reduce the result even when fees are earned.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR consists of 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the pool's yield is therefore fee-derived, with no current reward contribution reflected in the APR. Reward dependency and the duration of any future incentives are not established by the supplied metrics, so the fee component should be treated as the main basis for evaluating this position.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range results are not reported, so realized range exposure and recent IL cannot be assessed from the available data. As a MEMECOIN pool, LEOS-DGU is exposed to abrupt price moves, thin liquidity, and asymmetric demand; emission decay is an additional family-specific risk if incentives are introduced later, because exit timing may become more important once rewards fall or stop. The current fee-only structure also leaves the LP dependent on sustained trading activity.
tollLEOS Context
LEOS is one side of the pool's quoted price and inventory, so an LP holds exposure to its movement relative to DGU rather than simply earning fees in isolation. Liquidity depth for LEOS outside this pool is not established by these metrics; a sharp LEOS move or weak external liquidity can increase rebalancing costs and impermanent-loss risk.
tollDGU Context
DGU is the pool's counter-asset and determines the relative price at which LEOS inventory is rebalanced. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so DGU price action, market fragmentation, or a sudden loss of demand can affect both execution quality and the value of the LP position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing LEOS and DGU into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings change as prices move, and because this pool is a memecoin pair, low activity or a sharp price move can reduce the result even when fees are earned.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Eu9kcoMtyPhSoTa2rKKspL5DvDUzaZUrkFnriU2erZ1W
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- LEOS (5xgsnby6…)
- Token B
- DGU (7AL5rfx4…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool yield is represented by 0.1%, consisting of 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the present reward contribution is zero, future emission decay would matter mainly if incentives are introduced; otherwise the APR remains dependent on trading fees.
The current pool yield is represented by 0.1%, consisting of 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the present reward contribution is zero, future emission decay would matter mainly if incentives are introduced; otherwise the APR remains dependent on trading fees.
There is no current reward contribution in the displayed APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward component from current returns. The position would remain dependent on 0.1% and on trading activity relative to $57K.
There is no current reward contribution in the displayed APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward component from current returns. The position would remain dependent on 0.1% and on trading activity relative to $57K.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the possibility that fees remain small relative to capital committed. The pool has $57K and a fee-derived yield of 0.1%, while recent IL and range-exposure data are not reported.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the possibility that fees remain small relative to capital committed. The pool has $57K and a fee-derived yield of 0.1%, while recent IL and range-exposure data are not reported.
Consider exiting when the LEOS-DGU price approaches or leaves your active range, when 0.00x stays near zero, or when TVL declines without a compensating rise in fees. A worsening liquidity profile or collapse in 0.1% is a stronger exit signal than the headline APR alone.
Consider exiting when the LEOS-DGU price approaches or leaves your active range, when 0.00x stays near zero, or when TVL declines without a compensating rise in fees. A worsening liquidity profile or collapse in 0.1% is a stronger exit signal than the headline APR alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent IL and range history are not reported. Fees accrue at 0.1%, but the time needed to offset impermanent loss depends on the future price path, range management, and realized trading volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent IL and range history are not reported. Fees accrue at 0.1%, but the time needed to offset impermanent loss depends on the future price path, range management, and realized trading volume.
