new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 gives this pool a live HOLD verdict, with Enter at 40/100, Hold at 52/100, and Exit at 29/100. The ordering favors retaining an existing position over opening a new one, consistent with the stated ai_engine=hold driver, but the pool ranks only #276 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools. The assessment would weaken if $114K drains, $48K declines enough to reduce fee generation, or 37.6% falls toward the fee component without improved range data; it would strengthen only with durable volume, deeper liquidity, and evidence that positions remain in range.
Computed 2026-08-22 10:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$114.18K
Total value locked
$48.44K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up37.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 31.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored range around the current JLP/SOL price, set alerts when price moves ten percent beyond either range boundary, and rebalance or exit rather than leaving the position unmanaged. If fee income falls materially while price remains outside the range, exit instead of waiting for emissions, since the current reward component is 5.7%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 37.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 31.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $48.44K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $98.35 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 11 JLP-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#764 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4742 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JLP-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees when they swap, and you receive a share, but your deposit changes its mix of JLP and SOL as prices move, so you can end up with less value than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated total APR of 37.6% decomposes into 31.9% from trading fees and 5.7% from rewards. 85% of yield is fee-derived, while reward dependency and the reward schedule are not established; there is therefore no current basis for assuming emission support or estimating reward duration. Any future incentive program should be assessed for decay and expiry separately from fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
No usable seven-day impermanent-loss observation or tick-in-range history is reported, so recent divergence loss and the effectiveness of the active range cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, JLP-SOL carries price divergence, liquidity-withdrawal, and rapid sentiment-reversal risk; emission decay can remove any temporary subsidy, and exit timing matters because fees may not compensate for a fast move in either asset. Treat the absence of range and IL history as an information risk rather than as evidence of low loss.
tollJLP Context
JLP is the Jupiter perpetuals liquidity-provider token, representing exposure to the assets and trading outcomes of that liquidity pool; here it is paired directly against SOL. JLP's price relative to SOL determines the LP's inventory mix: as one side outperforms, the automated market maker generally sells part of that appreciating side into the other, so the position can underperform simply holding the better-performing asset. Liquidity depth for JLP outside this pair is not established by these pool metrics and should be checked before sizing a position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more liquid reference asset in this pair and may be the main source of price movement against JLP. A sharp SOL move can push the position out of its effective range, alter its inventory toward JLP or SOL, and increase divergence loss relative to holding both assets separately. SOL liquidity elsewhere is deeper than this pool's stated $114K, but that does not remove the risk of this pair's own range and execution conditions.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees when they swap, and you receive a share, but your deposit changes its mix of JLP and SOL as prices move, so you can end up with less value than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- J2Gsg3xTDjM8UZjKdEqzBeDwitHb2Ux6TSBX5RzsE42r
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JLP (27G8MtK7…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 5.7%, so the stated 37.6% is presently driven by 31.9% in trading fees. If emissions are introduced later, decay would reduce the reward portion over time while 85% indicates the current fee share of yield.
The current reward component is 5.7%, so the stated 37.6% is presently driven by 31.9% in trading fees. If emissions are introduced later, decay would reduce the reward portion over time while 85% indicates the current fee share of yield.
With rewards currently at 5.7%, expiry would not remove a present reward stream; the remaining yield would be trading-fee income, currently represented by 31.9%. If volume falls, the fee component and therefore total APR of 37.6% could also decline.
With rewards currently at 5.7%, expiry would not remove a present reward stream; the remaining yield would be trading-fee income, currently represented by 31.9%. If volume falls, the fee component and therefore total APR of 37.6% could also decline.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN family classification, JLP-SOL price divergence, and limited stated liquidity of $114K against $48K of recent volume. Seven-day IL and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range efficiency cannot be verified.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN family classification, JLP-SOL price divergence, and limited stated liquidity of $114K against $48K of recent volume. Seven-day IL and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range efficiency cannot be verified.
Exit or rebalance when price moves persistently outside your chosen range, when $114K begins draining, or when fee income no longer justifies the inventory and divergence risk. A material fall in 0.42x, 37.6%, or the live verdict HOLD would also warrant reassessment.
Exit or rebalance when price moves persistently outside your chosen range, when $114K begins draining, or when fee income no longer justifies the inventory and divergence risk. A material fall in 0.42x, 37.6%, or the live verdict HOLD would also warrant reassessment.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day IL history, tick-in-range history, and persistence data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery can be compared with 31.9%, but that annualized figure assumes stable volume and does not account for future price divergence, range exits, or changing liquidity.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day IL history, tick-in-range history, and persistence data are unavailable. Gross fee recovery can be compared with 31.9%, but that annualized figure assumes stable volume and does not account for future price divergence, range exits, or changing liquidity.
