Raydium CLMM vs Orca Whirlpool: Which Concentrated Liquidity Venue?
Raydium CLMM and Orca Whirlpool both implement Uniswap V3-style concentrated liquidity on Solana, but they make different trade-offs.
Raydium CLMM typically captures more aggregator volume — Jupiter routes a heavy share through Raydium. Higher native volume means higher passive fee income per dollar of LP.
Orca Whirlpool offers more fee-tier choices per pair (0.01% / 0.05% / 0.30% / 1.00%), letting LPs match tier to expected pair volatility. The UI is cleaner for active range management.
For major pairs (SOL-USDC, SOL-USDT), Raydium usually edges out on fee yield. For tighter or higher-fee niches, Orca's tier flexibility wins.
RAYDIUM-CLMM-VS-ORCA-WHIRLPOOL pools across DEXs
No live RAYDIUM-CLMM-VS-ORCA-WHIRLPOOL pools right now — check back shortly.
Frequently asked questions
Which has better fee APR on SOL-USDC?
Historically Raydium, by 10-30%. The gap closes when Orca runs liquidity-mining incentives.
Which has lower slippage for swaps?
Whichever has deeper liquidity at current price. Jupiter aggregator routes across both — for swaps, you almost always get the better quote automatically.
Are LP tokens fungible between Raydium CLMM and Orca Whirlpool?
No. Each protocol issues its own NFT-based position. You can't LP on one and withdraw on the other.
Explore more on WealthVille
Compare across DEXs
Cross-chain yields