new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 55/100 gives SOL-VDR a HOLD verdict, with Enter at 50/100, Hold at 60/100, and Exit at 22/100; the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #834 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it below most ranked alternatives, consistent with low trading activity and limited evidence of durable pool conditions rather than with an emissions-based opportunity. The assessment would improve if TVL and volume grew together while fee income persisted, and would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse in 2.1%.
Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$78.89K
Total value locked
$2.68K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -41.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance when VDR moves materially against SOL; otherwise set an exit trigger on falling TVL, weakening volume-to-liquidity, or a clear drop in 2.1%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.68K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.71 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-VDR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2242 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4994 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-VDR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and VDR into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold can change, and VDR's price or liquidity may fall faster than SOL's.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 2.1% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 99% of the reported yield comes from trading fees, so there is no stated reward component supporting the current APR. With 0.03x volume-to-liquidity, the fee rate depends on trading activity that is currently modest relative to deposited liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss reporting is unavailable, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be evaluated from those fields. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-VDR carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk in VDR, with emission decay and exit timing relevant if incentives are introduced or change. The absence of a stated lifecycle and persistence record adds uncertainty around how durable current conditions are.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid, widely traded asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere across Solana. SOL price movements change the pool's inventory mix: sustained SOL appreciation can leave an LP with proportionally more VDR, while sharp SOL moves can increase divergence loss relative to holding both assets.
tollVDR Context
VDR is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's. A rapid VDR repricing, thin order books, or reduced demand can increase divergence loss and make exiting the LP position more costly than exiting SOL alone.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and VDR into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold can change, and VDR's price or liquidity may fall faster than SOL's.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4egoNZCTQT7Q14peVnjPC2PTa16MWZUahA49QPcsWAEC
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- VDR (5a6LTLwd…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
10%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
177%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only income is 2.1% and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If emissions are added and later decay, the headline 2.1% would fall unless trading fees increase enough to replace them.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only income is 2.1% and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If emissions are added and later decay, the headline 2.1% would fall unless trading fees increase enough to replace them.
Because the reported reward-only APR is 0.0%, the current yield does not depend on a stated incentive stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only the reward component would disappear; fee income would depend on volume and liquidity, currently reflected by 0.03x.
Because the reported reward-only APR is 0.0%, the current yield does not depend on a stated incentive stream. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only the reward component would disappear; fee income would depend on volume and liquidity, currently reflected by 0.03x.
Risk is elevated because VDR can reprice sharply, liquidity can become difficult to exit, and the LP can suffer divergence loss relative to holding SOL and VDR separately. The pool's $79K TVL and 0.03x volume-to-liquidity indicate limited activity relative to deposited liquidity.
Risk is elevated because VDR can reprice sharply, liquidity can become difficult to exit, and the LP can suffer divergence loss relative to holding SOL and VDR separately. The pool's $79K TVL and 0.03x volume-to-liquidity indicate limited activity relative to deposited liquidity.
For SOL-VDR, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading volume weakens, the fee-derived 2.1% falls materially, or VDR's market becomes difficult to exit. A range breach that leaves the position concentrated in one token is also a practical exit or rebalance signal.
For SOL-VDR, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading volume weakens, the fee-derived 2.1% falls materially, or VDR's market becomes difficult to exit. A range breach that leaves the position concentrated in one token is also a practical exit or rebalance signal.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. At the current fee-only rate of 2.1%, recovery depends on how far SOL and VDR diverge, whether that divergence reverses, and whether trading fees remain at levels supporting 2.1%.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. At the current fee-only rate of 2.1%, recovery depends on how far SOL and VDR diverge, whether that divergence reverses, and whether trading fees remain at levels supporting 2.1%.
