new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 57/100 places SOL-KITTY in a middle-risk, middle-conviction area rather than a clear entry signal: Enter is 52/100, Hold is 63/100, and Exit is 18/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool that has meaningful fee activity but memecoin-specific price and liquidity risk; its #444 of 2403 rank among raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively stronger position than most listed pools, not an assurance of capital preservation. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sustained loss of volume, or a change from fee-funded yield to short-lived emissions would weaken the assessment; durable volume and liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-08-22 18:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$477.58K
Total value locked
$426.94K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up199.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -35.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a written withdrawal trigger before entering: exit if pool TVL materially falls or the volume-to-liquidity ratio drops below the current 0.89x level for a sustained period. For a concentrated-liquidity implementation, use a range sized for the expected SOL/KITTY volatility and rebalance only when price leaves that range; do not treat the quoted APR as protection against divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 199.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 110.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $426.94K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.28K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-KITTY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#483 of 53795 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #778 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-KITTY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and KITTY into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with less of one token and more of the other if their prices move differently.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 110.0% fee-only APR and 89.8% reward-only APR. 55% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns do not depend on an active reward emission. A reward schedule and its remaining duration are not established; any future emissions would add a separate, time-sensitive source of APR rather than explain the current figure.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day in-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-KITTY is exposed to abrupt KITTY repricing, SOL/KITTY divergence, liquidity migration, and fee compression after trading interest fades. Emission decay is a secondary concern at present because rewards are not contributing to the quoted APR, but exit timing still matters if volume or liquidity deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established base asset and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than KITTY. SOL price moves change the SOL/KITTY ratio; a sustained move in SOL relative to KITTY can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for the LP, even when trading fees remain available.
tollKITTY Context
KITTY is the pool's memecoin leg, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this market's participation than SOL's. A sharp KITTY rally or collapse can leave the LP holding more of the underperforming asset, while declining attention can reduce volume and the fee stream supporting 110.0%.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and KITTY into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with less of one token and more of the other if their prices move differently.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7dNW2mhCtqoZcDuyRbj5LMoeFsS9TpaCdSkk4qMstGPm
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- KITTY (4N4DnNo3…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
104%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
104%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 89.8%, so emission decay is not currently reducing the quoted return. If rewards are introduced later, decay would lower that reward component while leaving fee income dependent on trading volume.
Current reward-only APR is 89.8%, so emission decay is not currently reducing the quoted return. If rewards are introduced later, decay would lower that reward component while leaving fee income dependent on trading volume.
The current quoted APR is already composed of 110.0% fee-only APR and 89.8% reward-only APR, with 55% of yield from fees. If incentives are added and then expire, the reward portion would disappear and the pool would rely on trading fees alone.
The current quoted APR is already composed of 110.0% fee-only APR and 89.8% reward-only APR, with 55% of yield from fees. If incentives are added and then expire, the reward portion would disappear and the pool would rely on trading fees alone.
Risk is elevated because KITTY can move sharply against SOL and its liquidity can recede quickly. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is not available, so 199.8% should not be treated as a reliable offset for price divergence or a KITTY liquidity shock.
Risk is elevated because KITTY can move sharply against SOL and its liquidity can recede quickly. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is not available, so 199.8% should not be treated as a reliable offset for price divergence or a KITTY liquidity shock.
Use a pre-set signal rather than waiting for a headline: consider exiting if TVL drains, volume weakens below the current 0.89x turnover level, or the fee-only APR falls enough that it no longer compensates for SOL/KITTY divergence risk. A reward launch or expiry should also prompt a fresh return calculation.
Use a pre-set signal rather than waiting for a headline: consider exiting if TVL drains, volume weakens below the current 0.89x turnover level, or the fee-only APR falls enough that it no longer compensates for SOL/KITTY divergence risk. A reward launch or expiry should also prompt a fresh return calculation.
There is no recent seven-day impermanent-loss history from which to estimate a recovery period. Compare realized fee income, represented by 110.0%, with the value lost from token divergence; break-even can be indefinite if KITTY remains weak or trading volume contracts.
There is no recent seven-day impermanent-loss history from which to estimate a recovery period. Compare realized fee income, represented by 110.0%, with the value lost from token divergence; break-even can be indefinite if KITTY remains weak or trading volume contracts.
