WealthVille
GNET
G
BORG
B

GNET-BORGon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $48.69K
APR
3.5% APR
24h Volume
$219.29 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
8QF1fvZV…kk8N · observed 2026-11-04
19F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict AVOID · 61% confidence

ai_engine=holdhigh risk (0.91) + weak yield → avoid
How this score works →
Enter10

new capital

Hold30

keep position

Exit60

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1721 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, placing it in a middling position rather than among the strongest candidates. That assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, a collapse in fee yield, weaker volume, or impaired exits, and could improve only if liquidity and sustained trading activity increase without a corresponding rise in realized range or token risk.

Computed 2026-11-04 21:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$48.69K

Total value locked

$219.29

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

3.5%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -11.3%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 112m agoTVL ↑49.1%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 98% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 91/100
tips_and_updates

Use a narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently, and set a precommitted exit trigger at a material decline in observed volume or fee accrual; with 0.00x turnover, do not assume fees will compensate for a prolonged out-of-range position.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR3.5%——
Fee APR3.5%——
Volume$219.29——
Fees Earned$2.19——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
2.3%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−13.6%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-11.3%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
98% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 GNET-BORG pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1570 of 19999 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19329 of 153992

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GNET-BORG liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing GNET and BORG into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. The amount earned can fall when trading slows, while large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The advertised yield decomposes into 3.5% fee APR and 0.1% reward APR. 98% of the yield is attributed to trading fees, so the return depends on sustained swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward-duration estimate is available; the current fee rate should not be treated as stable because 24-hour volume is only $219 against $49K of liquidity.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so realized price divergence and range-management results cannot be assessed from the supplied history. As a MEMECOIN pool, GNET-BORG adds sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk beyond ordinary AMM exposure. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards contribute 0.1%; exit timing matters if trading volume weakens or either token reprices abruptly.

tollGNET Context

GNET is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, paired against BORG. Comparative GNET liquidity depth elsewhere is not provided, so a thinner external market could increase price impact and make rebalancing or exiting harder; a sharp GNET move can also push the position out of its selected range and amplify divergence loss.

tollBORG Context

BORG is the other asset in the pair and contributes the same two-asset price-exposure mechanics as GNET. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not provided, so BORG price action should be evaluated for market depth and exit slippage; a rapid BORG move can leave the LP concentrated in the weaker asset or outside its active range.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing GNET and BORG into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. The amount earned can fall when trading slows, while large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them.

token

Token Details

GNET
GNETSolana
Explorer

GNET is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

BORG
BORGSwissBorg TokenSolana
Explorer

SwissBorg Token (BORG) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
8QF1fvZV8yyMcw7sjMX78KhdJz21u811TiK4YAAzkk8N
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
GNET (3ZELuj8i…)
Token B
BORG (3dQTr7ro…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay has limited direct relevance at present because reward APR is 0.1% and total APR is 3.5%, with 98% of yield coming from fees. If rewards are introduced or reduced later, the reward component would decline while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

Emission decay has limited direct relevance at present because reward APR is 0.1% and total APR is 3.5%, with 98% of yield coming from fees. If rewards are introduced or reduced later, the reward component would decline while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

Because reward APR is currently 0.1%, expiration would not remove a material stated reward stream; the remaining return would be fee APR of 3.5%. That fee return can also fall if the pool's 0.00x turnover does not improve.

Because reward APR is currently 0.1%, expiration would not remove a material stated reward stream; the remaining return would be fee APR of 3.5%. That fee return can also fall if the pool's 0.00x turnover does not improve.

Risk is elevated because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family, and the pool has $49K of liquidity with $219 in 24-hour volume. Large token moves can create impermanent loss, while shallow liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.

Risk is elevated because both assets are in the MEMECOIN family, and the pool has $49K of liquidity with $219 in 24-hour volume. Large token moves can create impermanent loss, while shallow liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.

Consider exiting when volume or fee accrual deteriorates, when either token moves sharply enough to leave your range, or when available exit liquidity becomes inadequate. For this pool, 0.00x turnover and the absence of recent range history argue for monitoring rather than relying on the displayed 3.5%.

Consider exiting when volume or fee accrual deteriorates, when either token moves sharply enough to leave your range, or when available exit liquidity becomes inadequate. For this pool, 0.00x turnover and the absence of recent range history argue for monitoring rather than relying on the displayed 3.5%.

A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The displayed 3.5% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset price divergence within a particular period.

A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The displayed 3.5% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset price divergence within a particular period.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights