GFT-USD1on Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $20.05M
- APR
- 0.9% APR
- Fee tier
- 4.00% fee
- Pool address
- De8ckf1R…fUVF · observed 2026-08-23
Liquidityhelp
lock$20.05M
Total value locked
$0.00
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
—
fees earned, last 24h
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range centered on the current GFT-USD1 price only if you can monitor it, and rebalance when price approaches either range boundary; exit if $0 remains absent while GFT price movement increases.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GFT-USD1 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1619 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GFT-USD1 liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GFT and USD1 into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You may receive fees, but with $0 and 0.0% in rewards, the position depends mainly on future trading activity and can lose value if GFT moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 0.9% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency and duration are not established, so the displayed APR should not be treated as a durable incentive stream; the absence of observed volume also limits confidence that the fee component will persist.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range measurements are unavailable, so realized range behavior cannot be evaluated from the supplied history. As a MEMECOIN pool, GFT-USD1 has price-dislocation and exit-liquidity risk in addition to the usual concentrated-liquidity risk; emission decay or incentive changes can further reduce the reason to remain deployed, making exit timing important when trading activity or token momentum weakens.
tollGFT Context
GFT is the memecoin-side asset, and its price movement determines how the position shifts between GFT and USD1 as swaps cross the active range. Liquidity depth for GFT elsewhere is not established here; a sharp GFT repricing can create impermanent loss and may make rebalancing or exiting more difficult.
tollUSD1 Context
USD1 is the quoted asset and provides the stable-value side of the pair, subject to its own peg and redemption-liquidity risks. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here; weakness in USD1 would affect both the pool's reference price and the reliability of the LP's nominal value.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GFT and USD1 into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You may receive fees, but with $0 and 0.0% in rewards, the position depends mainly on future trading activity and can lose value if GFT moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- De8ckf1ReEnZRzzqTpyBmhGvoUwzLsgk1JjqnsyifUVF
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GFT (FhqFPYiS…)
- Token B
- USD1 (Fu7SNdg5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.9% and fee-only APR is 0.9%. Because reward duration and dependency are not established, any emission change could reduce the displayed APR without offsetting fee activity.
The reward component is 0.0%, while total APR is 0.9% and fee-only APR is 0.9%. Because reward duration and dependency are not established, any emission change could reduce the displayed APR without offsetting fee activity.
The pool would rely on its fee component, 0.9%, with 100% of current yield sourced from trading fees. Since $0 is the observed volume measure, an absence of trading activity would leave little evidence of ongoing LP income after incentives.
The pool would rely on its fee component, 0.9%, with 100% of current yield sourced from trading fees. Since $0 is the observed volume measure, an absence of trading activity would leave little evidence of ongoing LP income after incentives.
Risk is driven by GFT price volatility, concentrated range exposure, and the ability to exit when demand is weak. This pool has no supplied seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history, and $0 provides no evidence of recent trading flow.
Risk is driven by GFT price volatility, concentrated range exposure, and the ability to exit when demand is weak. This pool has no supplied seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history, and $0 provides no evidence of recent trading flow.
Consider exiting when GFT approaches a range boundary, when observed trading activity remains absent, or when the token's momentum makes rebalancing unfavorable. For this pool, $0 and the persistence of fee generation are more relevant exit signals than the headline 0.9%.
Consider exiting when GFT approaches a range boundary, when observed trading activity remains absent, or when the token's momentum makes rebalancing unfavorable. For this pool, $0 and the persistence of fee generation are more relevant exit signals than the headline 0.9%.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and $0 is absent. The nominal fee rate of 0.9% cannot establish recovery time without sustained realized volume and a stable enough GFT-USD1 price relationship.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and $0 is absent. The nominal fee rate of 0.9% cannot establish recovery time without sustained realized volume and a stable enough GFT-USD1 price relationship.
