SOL-Scamon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $589.38
- APR
- 43.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $0.72 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 8UPL8DB7…2uoy · observed 2026-10-12
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That outcome reflects an ai_engine=hold signal being outweighed by a CRITICAL scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1202 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, which places it well below the stronger part of the protocol set. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume relative to liquidity, deeper TVL, and a scanner result that is no longer critical; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-17 23:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$589.38
Total value locked
$0.72
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up43.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -13.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a small allocation with a wide range and review it whenever the live verdict remains EXIT or pool activity deteriorates; exit rather than widen the position after a sustained loss of trading volume or liquidity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 43.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 36.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.72 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.01 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 SOL-Scam pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2185 of 18853 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Scam liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCAM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 36.3% in trading fees and 7.4% in rewards, with 83% of the return sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the only identifiable current source of yield; emission decay could reduce any future incentive contribution, while fee income will remain dependent on actual trading volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price-divergence exposure and capital utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SCAM adds token-specific volatility and liquidity risk to SOL exposure. Emissions, if introduced, can decay quickly, making exit timing important when trading activity or incentives weaken.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool's $589. If SOL moves sharply while SCAM does not, or vice versa, the concentrated position can accumulate inventory in the weaker-performing asset and increase impermanent-loss exposure.
tollScam Context
SCAM is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity may be more dependent on this pool than SOL's is. A sharp SCAM decline can leave the LP holding more SCAM, while thin external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCAM into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less value than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8UPL8DB7BeW6Dbdp2ZGw4rtg4H5DeJnhufyuj3u42uoy
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Scam (9mNjA6Bi…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 43.7%, composed of 36.3% in fees and 7.4% in rewards. Because the identifiable yield is fee-based, emission decay would mainly reduce any future incentive component rather than the current fee source.
The current return is 43.7%, composed of 36.3% in fees and 7.4% in rewards. Because the identifiable yield is fee-based, emission decay would mainly reduce any future incentive component rather than the current fee source.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of return. With 83% already coming from fees and $1 in recent volume, the post-incentive APR would depend on whether trading activity increases or remains limited.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of return. With 83% already coming from fees and $1 in recent volume, the post-incentive APR would depend on whether trading activity increases or remains limited.
Risk is high because SCAM can move sharply against SOL, while concentrated liquidity and limited pool activity can make exits less efficient. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the size of that exposure cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is high because SCAM can move sharply against SOL, while concentrated liquidity and limited pool activity can make exits less efficient. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so the size of that exposure cannot be measured from the supplied data.
For SOL-SCAM, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains critical, or liquidity and trading activity deteriorate. A persistent 0.00x turnover level provides little evidence that the position is being supported by active fee generation.
For SOL-SCAM, an exit is warranted if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains critical, or liquidity and trading activity deteriorate. A persistent 0.00x turnover level provides little evidence that the position is being supported by active fee generation.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fees vary with volume. At 36.3% fee-only APR, recovering a comparable loss would take many months even if fee generation remained constant, and price divergence could extend that period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fees vary with volume. At 36.3% fee-only APR, recovering a comparable loss would take many months even if fee generation remained constant, and price divergence could extend that period.
