DGU-xlrton Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $92.03K
- APR
- 1.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $460.04 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- AUD4ZUj2…KHMt · observed 2026-08-25
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 54/100, and Exit at 27/100; the live verdict is HOLD. Its rank of #903 among 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed alternatives, but the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold rather than a demonstrated improvement in liquidity or range performance. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, or the fee-derived APR fell materially; it would strengthen if sustained volume increased without a comparable rise in liquidity risk.
Computed 2026-08-25 09:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$92.03K
Total value locked
$460.04
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently; rebalance when the price approaches either boundary, and exit if TVL falls materially or trading activity no longer supports 1.7%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $460.04 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.60 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 DGU-xlrt pools
by AI Farmer Score
#777 of 13158 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5208 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the DGU-xlrt liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing DGU and XLRT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of one token and a lower combined value than simply holding both, especially if memecoin demand disappears.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted return decomposes into 1.7% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return is not being supported by reported reward emissions. The reward dependency and schedule are not established, so future APR should be assessed from realized volume and fee generation rather than assumed incentives.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss estimate and observed tick-in-range history are not available for this pool, so recent range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, DGU-XLRT carries token-price, liquidity, and exit-liquidity risk beyond the fee calculation; emission decay can reduce any incentive component, while thin trading activity can make rebalancing or closing the position more costly. Exit timing matters because memecoin liquidity and demand can deteriorate faster than annualized APR updates reflect.
tollDGU Context
DGU is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position and is exposed to the pool's quoted price relationship with XLRT. The available pool data does not establish DGU's liquidity depth elsewhere, so price moves may be harder to hedge or exit during stressed conditions. A sharp DGU move changes the inventory mix held by the LP and can create impermanent loss relative to holding the tokens separately.
tollxlrt Context
XLRT is the other side of the DGU-XLRT pair and determines where the position sits within its active price range. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data, making external exit conditions an important unknown. Strong XLRT price movement can push the position toward one-sided inventory and increase the need for range management.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing DGU and XLRT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of one token and a lower combined value than simply holding both, especially if memecoin demand disappears.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AUD4ZUj2UbH4a92uAsMPAWzFdzbVNkyY33jy9LzEKHMt
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- DGU (7AL5rfx4…)
- Token B
- xlrt (J1bZFRAF…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% reward APR and 1.7% fee APR, with 99% of yield from trading fees. Because the reward schedule is not established, any emission decay would mainly reduce the reward component; the fee component still depends on actual volume.
The pool currently shows 0.0% reward APR and 1.7% fee APR, with 99% of yield from trading fees. Because the reward schedule is not established, any emission decay would mainly reduce the reward component; the fee component still depends on actual volume.
The reward portion could fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the main return. For DGU-XLRT, that means comparing realized fees, represented by 1.7%, with the risks of concentrated exposure rather than treating 1.7% as persistent.
The reward portion could fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the main return. For DGU-XLRT, that means comparing realized fees, represented by 1.7%, with the risks of concentrated exposure rather than treating 1.7% as persistent.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and potentially rapid changes in exit conditions. The pool has $92K TVL and $460 in recent volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are unavailable, so downside cannot be inferred from a verified seven-day record.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and potentially rapid changes in exit conditions. The pool has $92K TVL and $460 in recent volume, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are unavailable, so downside cannot be inferred from a verified seven-day record.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer compensates for concentrated price exposure, or when price approaches a range boundary and you cannot actively rebalance. For this pool, a falling 0.00x ratio or declining 1.7% would be practical warning signals.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer compensates for concentrated price exposure, or when price approaches a range boundary and you cannot actively rebalance. For this pool, a falling 0.00x ratio or declining 1.7% would be practical warning signals.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not available and fee accrual varies with volume. 1.7% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset the position's price divergence within a fixed period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not available and fee accrual varies with volume. 1.7% is an annualized estimate, not a guarantee that fees will offset the position's price divergence within a fixed period.
