new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That assessment is consistent with the scanner's CRITICAL status and the strong, unopposed EXIT signal, even though the AI engine reads hold. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed in isolation, but the ranking does not offset weak activity and limited yield utility. The assessment would change if sustained volume materially improved fee generation, TVL stabilized or grew, and the scanner no longer showed an unopposed critical exit signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-11-11 09:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$283.46K
Total value locked
$2.42K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -12.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a defined exit trigger rather than waiting for emissions: exit if pool TVL begins draining or if volume-to-liquidity activity remains below 0.01x after a rebalance review; do not rely on an assumed reward schedule because reward duration is not established.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.42K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 SOL-EPIK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12874 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18717 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-EPIK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EPIK into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The return is currently fee-based, and price changes between the two tokens can leave you with a less valuable mix than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR decomposes into 0.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return does not depend on an active reward stream; reward dependency and reward-duration data are not established. If incentives are introduced or removed, the fee-only component remains the relevant baseline.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, EPIK price shocks, thin liquidity, and rapid volume decay can make exit execution more difficult. Emission decay is an additional family-specific risk if incentives appear later, while exit timing matters because low activity can increase slippage during a withdrawal or rebalance.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired with EPIK and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than the pool itself. If SOL rises or falls materially while EPIK does not move proportionally, the LP position accumulates inventory imbalance and may underperform simply holding the two assets.
tollEPIK Context
EPIK is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other concentrated venues than SOL's. A sharp EPIK repricing can create impermanent loss, while falling interest can reduce swap volume and make the position harder to exit efficiently.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and EPIK into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The return is currently fee-based, and price changes between the two tokens can leave you with a less valuable mix than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AZaaQaRhp1ys9VaJBRZYbmPz3JSBSp7m8cSSrLBn4BP9
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- EPIK (3BgwJ8b7…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted total APR of 0.5% is presently driven by 0.5% in fees. If future emissions decay, the pool's return would move toward its fee-only level unless trading volume increases.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted total APR of 0.5% is presently driven by 0.5% in fees. If future emissions decay, the pool's return would move toward its fee-only level unless trading volume increases.
There is currently no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so incentive expiry would not remove a currently observed reward component. The remaining reference return would be 0.5% in fees, which depends on trading activity rather than emissions.
There is currently no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so incentive expiry would not remove a currently observed reward component. The remaining reference return would be 0.5% in fees, which depends on trading activity rather than emissions.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because EPIK can move sharply against SOL and the pool has TVL of $283K with a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.01x. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are not reported, so the size of that risk cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because EPIK can move sharply against SOL and the pool has TVL of $283K with a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.01x. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are not reported, so the size of that risk cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
For SOL-EPIK, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls, trading activity weakens from 0.01x, or the critical scanner signal remains unopposed. An LP should also reassess before any suspected emission decay because exit timing can matter more than the nominal fee APR in a low-activity memecoin pool.
For SOL-EPIK, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls, trading activity weakens from 0.01x, or the critical scanner signal remains unopposed. An LP should also reassess before any suspected emission decay because exit timing can matter more than the nominal fee APR in a low-activity memecoin pool.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume is uncertain. At 0.5% fee APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and favorable relative price movement, not merely passage of time.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume is uncertain. At 0.5% fee APR, recovery would require sustained fee generation and favorable relative price movement, not merely passage of time.
