new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 54/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 50/100, the Hold threshold of 60/100, and the Exit threshold of 21/100; the live verdict is HOLD. The underlying engine indicates hold, but high risk at 51/100 combined with weak yield produces an avoid assessment, and the pool ranks #602 of 2403 raydium-amm pools. The assessment could improve if sustained volume increased fee income without a comparable rise in risk, while a TVL drain, weaker trading activity, or further yield collapse would reinforce the current verdict.
Computed 2026-08-21 20:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$10.50M
Total value locked
$237.00K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -26.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range with a predefined lower and upper boundary, and rebalance or exit when LIKE approaches either boundary after a sustained directional move. Do not widen the range solely to avoid managing it; that can leave capital exposed to a one-sided memecoin position while fee generation remains dependent on the pool's limited activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $237.00K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $592.51 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 LIKE-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1275 of 53795 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3332 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the LIKE-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing LIKE and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the asset that has fallen in price and less of the asset that has risen.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.1% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 99%. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component does not contribute to the stated APR. Because the pool is in the MEMECOIN family, any future emissions should be treated as temporary support rather than a durable return source; fee income depends on sustained swap volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
The supplied metrics do not establish recent seven-day impermanent loss or the share of time that liquidity remained in range, so recent loss experience and range efficiency cannot be quantified here. LIKE-SOL has MEMECOIN exposure: sharp LIKE price moves against SOL can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while a concentrated position can stop earning fees after price leaves its range. Emission decay and uncertain farm persistence add exit-timing risk, and the risk score is 51/100.
tollLIKE Context
LIKE is the memecoin leg of this pool, so its price movement relative to SOL determines how the LP inventory shifts between LIKE and SOL. Liquidity depth for LIKE outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a fall in external liquidity can increase slippage and make rebalancing or exiting more costly. A sharp LIKE rally or decline can therefore affect the LP through both inventory conversion and impermanent loss.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the benchmark asset paired with LIKE and provides the pool's more established reference side. The supplied metrics do not quantify SOL liquidity elsewhere, but SOL price changes still alter the LIKE/SOL ratio and can move an LP position out of its earning range. Relative performance matters more than SOL's absolute price: LP risk rises when LIKE and SOL diverge sharply.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing LIKE and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the asset that has fallen in price and less of the asset that has risen.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FuemMjepntbzthvSEVmDGnfq7YWr8UebZrAXJrP46VtF
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- LIKE (CJMihkPY…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
306%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
92%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 2.1% and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If emissions are reduced further, the stated APR will depend almost entirely on trading volume and fee generation.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 2.1% and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If emissions are reduced further, the stated APR will depend almost entirely on trading volume and fee generation.
There is no current reward contribution in the reported APR, so the immediate return base is 2.1% from trading fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would lose that reward component while fee income would remain dependent on volume, currently represented by 0.02x volume relative to TVL.
There is no current reward contribution in the reported APR, so the immediate return base is 2.1% from trading fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would lose that reward component while fee income would remain dependent on volume, currently represented by 0.02x volume relative to TVL.
Risk is elevated because LIKE can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and one-sided inventory. The pool's risk score is 51/100, and recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy data are not established by the supplied metrics.
Risk is elevated because LIKE can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and one-sided inventory. The pool's risk score is 51/100, and recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy data are not established by the supplied metrics.
Consider exiting when LIKE approaches a range boundary, when external liquidity weakens, or when fee income no longer compensates for the risk of holding the pool's inventory. A sustained TVL drain, declining volume, or a weaker APR would also support an exit rather than waiting for emissions to offset the position.
Consider exiting when LIKE approaches a range boundary, when external liquidity weakens, or when fee income no longer compensates for the risk of holding the pool's inventory. A sustained TVL drain, declining volume, or a weaker APR would also support an exit rather than waiting for emissions to offset the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss history, price path, and realized fee data. The reported annualized fee component is 2.1%, but that does not establish how long fees would take to offset a future LIKE-SOL price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss history, price path, and realized fee data. The reported annualized fee component is 2.1%, but that does not establish how long fees would take to offset a future LIKE-SOL price divergence.
