Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 56% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 62/100 combines an Enter score of 58/100, Hold score of 67/100, and Exit score of 15/100. The live verdict is HOLD: the ai_engine currently favors enter, but promotion is pending the required dwell period, so the signal has not yet become an enter verdict. Its rank of #50 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it relatively high within the tracked set, but that ranking does not remove memecoin or range risk. A sustained TVL drain, material volume decline, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; persistent fee generation and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-06 13:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$233.12K
Total value locked
$214.13K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 327.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range narrow enough to earn fees but wide enough for normal NEET-SOL volatility, and withdraw or reset the position as soon as the active range is exited; do not leave the position passively deployed through a sharp NEET repricing.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 337.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $214.13K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.09K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 neet-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#213 of 3058 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1253 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the neet-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both NEET and SOL into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with more of the weaker asset and reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
NEET-SOL decomposes its total APR into 337.2% fee APR and 162.8% reward APR. 67% means the displayed yield is currently generated by trading fees rather than token incentives. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee rate should be treated as variable: it depends on future volume, liquidity, and fee capture rather than representing a fixed return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss exposure and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NEET-SOL is exposed to abrupt NEET repricing, shallow or changing liquidity, and concentrated-liquidity range exits; emission decay is less relevant to the current fee-only APR but would matter if incentives are introduced later. Exit timing is therefore important: a position left in place after a sharp NEET move can become heavily one-sided or stop earning fees outside its active range.
tollneet Context
NEET is the memecoin side of this pair and is the main source of idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk for the LP. The available pool data does not establish NEET's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp NEET move can create impermanent loss, while a decline in external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established settlement asset in the pair and generally has deeper market liquidity than NEET. SOL price changes still affect the relative NEET-SOL exchange rate, so an LP can incur impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid; SOL strength or weakness also changes which asset accumulates as the range moves.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both NEET and SOL into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with more of the weaker asset and reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BkocTzcvrhjwy38EYVyvhhVydeyqedasLVCJ8Z2HFyCN
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- neet (Ce2gx9KG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
19%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split into 337.2% from fees and 162.8% from rewards, so current emission decay does not account for the displayed yield. If incentives are added or become material, declining emissions would reduce the reward component while fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
The current APR is split into 337.2% from fees and 162.8% from rewards, so current emission decay does not account for the displayed yield. If incentives are added or become material, declining emissions would reduce the reward component while fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
There is currently no reward component in the displayed APR, so an incentive expiry would not directly remove the present reward APR. If future incentives are introduced, expiry would leave fee income as the remaining yield source, and the resulting APR could fall if trading volume does not compensate.
There is currently no reward component in the displayed APR, so an incentive expiry would not directly remove the present reward APR. If future incentives are introduced, expiry would leave fee income as the remaining yield source, and the resulting APR could fall if trading volume does not compensate.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because NEET can reprice abruptly and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The fee-only APR of 337.2% does not guarantee protection from impermanent loss, range exit, or difficulty exiting during a fast move.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because NEET can reprice abruptly and its external liquidity depth is not established here. The fee-only APR of 337.2% does not guarantee protection from impermanent loss, range exit, or difficulty exiting during a fast move.
For NEET-SOL, consider exiting or resetting when the position leaves its active tick range, when NEET liquidity deteriorates, or when fee generation falls enough that it no longer compensates for concentrated-liquidity risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse from 337.2% would also weaken the case for remaining deployed.
For NEET-SOL, consider exiting or resetting when the position leaves its active tick range, when NEET liquidity deteriorates, or when fee generation falls enough that it no longer compensates for concentrated-liquidity risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse from 337.2% would also weaken the case for remaining deployed.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and range placement. 337.2% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate; break-even depends on future fees, NEET-SOL price divergence, and how long the position stays in range.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and range placement. 337.2% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate; break-even depends on future fees, NEET-SOL price divergence, and how long the position stays in range.
