new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 42/100, with Enter at 37/100, Hold at 50/100, and Exit at 31/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That result is consistent with the stated drivers: ai_engine=hold, risk score 80/100, weak yield relative to the risk, and a farmer score of 33/100. Ranked #912 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, 67-SOL is not positioned as a stronger alternative within the protocol. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume lifted fee generation, TVL became more resilient, and risk declined; a TVL drain, weaker fees, or further yield collapse would reinforce the avoid verdict.
Computed 2026-10-09 13:09 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$50.69K
Total value locked
$1.08K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up42.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 31.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range rather than leaving capital passively deployed: rebalance only when the position moves materially outside the intended price band, and exit if TVL falls materially below $51K or fee accrual no longer supports 35.3%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 42.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 35.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.08K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $49.64 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 67-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#752 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4147 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the 67-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both 67 and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You may earn fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if 67 and SOL move differently, and thin liquidity can make exiting harder.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 35.3% fee APR and 7.0% reward APR. 83% of the yield comes from trading fees, so there is no meaningful incentive component currently cushioning weak activity. Reward dependency is not established, and no time horizon for emissions is available; any future emission decay would reduce the reward component further if incentives are introduced.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range observations are unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, 67-SOL carries token-specific price-collapse and liquidity-exit risk in addition to ordinary divergence between 67 and SOL. Emission decay matters because a reduction in incentives would leave fee generation as the main support, while exit timing becomes more important if volume or liquidity deteriorates.
toll67 Context
67 is the memecoin side of this pair, and the supplied pool data does not establish how deep its liquidity is elsewhere. A sharp move in 67 can create divergence against SOL, changing the LP inventory toward the weaker-performing asset and increasing exit slippage when pool liquidity is thin.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established settlement asset in this pair, but it remains exposed to price movement against 67. SOL strength can leave an LP with more 67 exposure after rebalancing, while SOL weakness can produce the opposite inventory shift; the effect depends on the direction and persistence of the price move.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both 67 and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You may earn fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if 67 and SOL move differently, and thin liquidity can make exiting harder.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Da6gBAjx2G4V1zbk7DNkKfDAzk3VVxS3aCoe5QN3TbxJ
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- 67 (9AvytnUK…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
1%
APR
22%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 7.0%, so the stated 42.3% APR is supported by 35.3% in fees rather than active rewards. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would remain dependent on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 7.0%, so the stated 42.3% APR is supported by 35.3% in fees rather than active rewards. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would remain dependent on trading volume.
There is no meaningful reward component currently shown: reward-only APR is 7.0% and 83% of yield comes from fees. After incentives expire, the position would rely on fee income, which is exposed to the pool's limited activity and $51K liquidity base.
There is no meaningful reward component currently shown: reward-only APR is 7.0% and 83% of yield comes from fees. After incentives expire, the position would rely on fee income, which is exposed to the pool's limited activity and $51K liquidity base.
Risk is elevated because 67 can experience rapid price declines, while thin liquidity can increase slippage and inventory imbalance. The risk score is 80/100, and the pool's $51K TVL and 0.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio provide limited evidence of trading depth.
Risk is elevated because 67 can experience rapid price declines, while thin liquidity can increase slippage and inventory imbalance. The risk score is 80/100, and the pool's $51K TVL and 0.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio provide limited evidence of trading depth.
For 67-SOL, consider exiting when TVL declines materially from $51K, fee income no longer justifies the exposure, or the live verdict remains HOLD while trading activity weakens. Exit timing matters more when incentives are absent because there is no substantial reward stream to offset deteriorating fees.
For 67-SOL, consider exiting when TVL declines materially from $51K, fee income no longer justifies the exposure, or the live verdict remains HOLD while trading activity weakens. Exit timing matters more when incentives are absent because there is no substantial reward stream to offset deteriorating fees.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Fee-based recovery would depend on 35.3% continuing without a decline in volume or liquidity, so the nominal 42.3% APR should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Fee-based recovery would depend on 35.3% continuing without a decline in volume or liquidity, so the nominal 42.3% APR should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
