new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, supports the live EXIT rather than a strong accumulation signal. Its rank of #1108 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not offset the small $53K, low 0.01x turnover, and lack of reward contribution. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. A TVL drain, further volume deterioration, fee collapse, or worsening COOK liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-06 05:26 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$52.76K
Total value locked
$362.75
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately wide SOL/COOK range and set an exit rule tied to a sustained drop in daily volume or visible pool liquidity; without reliable range history, avoid concentrating the position in a narrow band.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $362.75 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.91 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-COOK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#882 of 80377 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1285 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-COOK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and COOK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold changes with the market, and a large COOK price move can leave you with a less favorable result than simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-COOK decomposes into 0.6% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. The absence of reward APR removes direct emission dependence, but it also means future returns fall if trading activity declines; the current 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio indicates that fee production is modest relative to the capital deployed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-COOK carries substantial token-specific and exit-liquidity risk in addition to ordinary SOL/COOK price divergence. Emission decay is less immediate here because reward APR is zero, but exit timing still matters: reduced attention or liquidity can make withdrawal more costly and reduce fee generation.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established Solana-side asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across the wider Solana market than a single small pool can provide. SOL price movements relative to COOK drive the LP's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues generating fees.
tollCOOK Context
COOK is the pool's memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp COOK move, weakening demand, or fragmented liquidity can shift the LP toward the depreciating asset and make timely exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and COOK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you hold changes with the market, and a large COOK price move can leave you with a less favorable result than simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- G2MVMpFBXT5nhN1Ky8kJf6SuF7VH6y33QaqueZ1aykDw
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- COOK (G8Vy25Nz…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has no current contribution to this pool's displayed return because 0.0% is zero. The stated 0.6% therefore depends on 0.6% from trading fees, although lower activity would still reduce future realized yield.
Emission decay has no current contribution to this pool's displayed return because 0.0% is zero. The stated 0.6% therefore depends on 0.6% from trading fees, although lower activity would still reduce future realized yield.
There is no current reward APR shown for SOL-COOK, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The position would continue to depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.6% and 100%.
There is no current reward APR shown for SOL-COOK, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The position would continue to depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.6% and 100%.
Risk is elevated because COOK can move sharply, liquidity is small at $53K, and the pool has only $363 of recent volume. Fees may offset part of the effect, but N/A and N/A do not provide a recorded seven-day history for measuring that offset.
Risk is elevated because COOK can move sharply, liquidity is small at $53K, and the pool has only $363 of recent volume. Fees may offset part of the effect, but N/A and N/A do not provide a recorded seven-day history for measuring that offset.
For SOL-COOK, consider exiting when pool liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when COOK demand weakens, or when price leaves your intended range and re-entry conditions are unfavorable. A persistent decline from $363 or $53K would weaken the fee-based case.
For SOL-COOK, consider exiting when pool liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when COOK demand weakens, or when price leaves your intended range and re-entry conditions are unfavorable. A persistent decline from $363 or $53K would weaken the fee-based case.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. As a rough framework, fee recovery takes about the inverse of 0.6% in years before accounting for additional price divergence, withdrawals, and changing activity.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. As a rough framework, fee recovery takes about the inverse of 0.6% in years before accounting for additional price divergence, withdrawals, and changing activity.
