new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The score is consistent with the CRITICAL scanner and the strong, unopposed EXIT signal, despite the ai_engine=hold driver. At rank #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, this pool is positioned well below most ranked alternatives, with low volume relative to liquidity and no reward contribution. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased, liquidity remained stable, and fee generation rose; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker $MICHI liquidity would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-11-05 21:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$319.56K
Total value locked
$914.25
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a conservatively sized, actively monitored range rather than a passive position, and set a hard exit trigger for a material TVL drain, further volume contraction, or persistence of the CRITICAL scanner signal; do not wait for emissions to compensate for deteriorating activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $914.25 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 8 SOL-$michi pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12375 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17940 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$michi liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $MICHI into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but the pool currently has little activity and no displayed reward contribution, and you can end up with less value than if you had simply held both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield is decomposed into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the yield comes from trading fees, while the reward schedule and dependency are not established. With no current reward contribution shown, any future emissions would be incremental rather than the basis of the present APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading is not available, and reported tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$MICHI is exposed to sharp $MICHI price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid changes in trading interest. Emission decay matters if incentives appear later: LPs should not assume temporary emissions will persist, and exit timing should precede a liquidity or attention drain rather than follow it.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired with $MICHI and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single memecoin. SOL price movement changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL moves materially relative to $MICHI. Its broader liquidity can make SOL the easier side to trade, but it does not remove the pair's exposure to $MICHI-specific volatility.
toll$michi Context
$MICHI is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to contribute most of the idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. A sharp $MICHI move against SOL can shift the position toward the declining asset and increase impermanent loss relative to simply holding both tokens. Thin or weakening $MICHI liquidity can also make exit execution more difficult even when the displayed pool TVL appears stable.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $MICHI into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You earn a portion of trading fees, but the pool currently has little activity and no displayed reward contribution, and you can end up with less value than if you had simply held both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GH8Ers4yzKR3UKDvgVu8cqJfGzU4cU62mTeg9bcJ7ug6
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $michi (5mbK36SZ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
20%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current figures show 0.0% reward APR and 0.2% fee APR, so present yield is not being supported by emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, the APR would fall toward the fee-only level unless trading volume improves.
The current figures show 0.0% reward APR and 0.2% fee APR, so present yield is not being supported by emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, the APR would fall toward the fee-only level unless trading volume improves.
The pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.2%, rather than rewards. Because the current reward contribution is 0.0% and no reward schedule is established, the practical effect is limited now, but low volume could leave fee income insufficient to offset price-related losses.
The pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.2%, rather than rewards. Because the current reward contribution is 0.0% and no reward schedule is established, the practical effect is limited now, but low volume could leave fee income insufficient to offset price-related losses.
Risk is elevated because $MICHI can move sharply or lose liquidity relative to SOL. This pool has $320K in liquidity, $914 in recent volume, and 0.2% total APR, so fee income is small relative to the pair's potential price and exit risk.
Risk is elevated because $MICHI can move sharply or lose liquidity relative to SOL. This pool has $320K in liquidity, $914 in recent volume, and 0.2% total APR, so fee income is small relative to the pair's potential price and exit risk.
For SOL-$MICHI, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, volume contracts, or TVL drains. Do not rely on future emissions to delay an exit when fee generation is only 0.2%.
For SOL-$MICHI, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, volume contracts, or TVL drains. Do not rely on future emissions to delay an exit when fee generation is only 0.2%.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The gross fee rate is 0.2%, so breaking even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SOL and $MICHI prices diverge.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The gross fee rate is 0.2%, so breaking even depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SOL and $MICHI prices diverge.
