new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 61/100 produces Enter 58/100, Hold 66/100, and Exit 17/100 scores, with the live verdict HOLD and the verdict driver listed as ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #219 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the pool-specific memecoin and liquidity risks; the hold reading is consistent with fee-funded activity that merits monitoring rather than an automatic entry signal. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume declines, or fee APR collapses, and would strengthen only if fee generation persists through those changes without worsening price-range exposure.
Computed 2026-09-06 10:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$122.61K
Total value locked
$212.28K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 557.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current CARDS-SOL price, monitor whether price leaves that range, and rebalance only while fee generation remains material. Exit or widen the position if volume contracts materially from $212K or if fee APR falls below the level needed to compensate for holding the now-dominant asset.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $212.28K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.96K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 CARDS-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#195 of 3058 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1213 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but your holdings can end up weighted toward the asset that fell in price, and the value can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The Total APR decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield attributed to fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current yield profile should therefore be evaluated against sustained trading volume rather than assumed incentives. If rewards are later added, their emission schedule and remaining duration should be checked before treating them as recurring income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not currently reported, so recent loss severity and how consistently the position has remained active cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, CARDS-SOL can experience sharp, one-sided price moves and rapid liquidity changes; emission decay can reduce any future incentive component, while exit timing matters because fee income may fall after attention and volume leave the pool.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the memecoin side of this pair and should be treated as the higher-idiosyncratic-risk asset unless separate market-depth data shows otherwise. A sharp CARDS move against SOL can shift the LP inventory toward CARDS after it underperforms, or toward SOL after it rallies, while the pool's fee income depends on continued CARDS-SOL trading.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the major-asset reference side of the pair and generally anchors the pool's quoted price for CARDS. SOL volatility still affects the LP: a SOL move can create impermanent loss even when CARDS is stable, and a joint move in both assets can change the position's dollar value and range placement.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but your holdings can end up weighted toward the asset that fell in price, and the value can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- JCWhn7o8Lrj8Sf5c6caWngksVD2zb9eMEbQS4z619kFB
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
19%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the present yield is not relying on a reward emission. If incentives are introduced or later become relevant, emission decay would reduce that reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current APR is split between 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the present yield is not relying on a reward emission. If incentives are introduced or later become relevant, emission decay would reduce that reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 500.0% as the relevant recurring yield measure. For CARDS-SOL, that makes continued volume and the resulting 100% especially important when deciding whether to remain in the position.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 500.0% as the relevant recurring yield measure. For CARDS-SOL, that makes continued volume and the resulting 100% especially important when deciding whether to remain in the position.
Risk is elevated because CARDS can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can leave quickly when memecoin attention fades. The pool currently shows $123K of liquidity and $212K of 24h volume, but recent impermanent-loss and range-retention readings are not reported, so those risks cannot be reduced to a recent-loss estimate.
Risk is elevated because CARDS can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can leave quickly when memecoin attention fades. The pool currently shows $123K of liquidity and $212K of 24h volume, but recent impermanent-loss and range-retention readings are not reported, so those risks cannot be reduced to a recent-loss estimate.
For CARDS-SOL, consider exiting when trading volume or fee APR falls enough that fees no longer justify exposure, when TVL is draining, or when price remains outside your chosen range. A sustained loss of CARDS liquidity or a sharp change in the pool's inventory is also an exit signal rather than a reason to wait for historic APR to persist.
For CARDS-SOL, consider exiting when trading volume or fee APR falls enough that fees no longer justify exposure, when TVL is draining, or when price remains outside your chosen range. A sustained loss of CARDS liquidity or a sharp change in the pool's inventory is also an exit signal rather than a reason to wait for historic APR to persist.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. The current fee component is 500.0%, but that is an annualized snapshot, not a guarantee that fees will offset divergence between CARDS and SOL.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. The current fee component is 500.0%, but that is an annualized snapshot, not a guarantee that fees will offset divergence between CARDS and SOL.
