new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a middle-ground assessment: the fee-only structure is transparent, but low volume relative to liquidity and memecoin volatility limit the case for increasing exposure. The pool ranks #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, which places it well above the long tail but does not remove position-specific risks. The assessment would worsen if TVL drains, trading volume contracts, or fee yield collapses; it would improve if sustained volume rises without a comparable increase in liquidity or if reliable incentives appear.
Computed 2026-11-11 17:05 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$79.44K
Total value locked
$363.24
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored price range rather than treating this as passive liquidity: rebalance when the position approaches a range boundary, and exit if fee volume remains weak while SHIB volatility expands or pool liquidity drains.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $363.24 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.91 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-SHIB pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4469 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9061 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SHIB liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SHIB into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up with more of one token and fewer total assets than if you had simply held both, especially when their prices move differently.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR decomposes into 0.9% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, leaving no current reward contribution to support the quoted return. Reward dependency and the timing of any future emissions are not established, so an LP should not model a reward runway or assume the current APR persists if volume declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so the pool does not provide a current historical estimate for how divergence affected LP returns. Recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving range utilization unmeasured. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SHIB carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk; emission decay and exit timing matter because any future incentives could decline quickly, while the current fee-only structure means there is no reward cushion against weak volume.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the deeper and more widely traded asset in this pair, with liquidity across Solana venues beyond this pool. SOL price movement changes the pair's relative price and can create impermanent loss for LPs when SHIB does not move in step, while broad SOL liquidity may make SOL-side exits easier than exits involving SHIB.
tollSHIB Context
SHIB is the memecoin exposure in this pool, and its liquidity is more dependent on venue, bridge, and market conditions than SOL's. A sharp SHIB move against SOL can increase impermanent loss and alter the pool's composition, while a drop in SHIB trading activity can reduce fee generation and make exit execution more sensitive to pool depth.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SHIB into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can end up with more of one token and fewer total assets than if you had simply held both, especially when their prices move differently.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 14bLC2KcZ2yFyCDSzHsNemoXUGf9fCmgqQ8jeHEfr3Ed
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SHIB (F6qoefQq…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. Because the displayed return is fee-funded, emission decay would have little direct effect now, but any future incentives could fall as a MEMECOIN campaign ages and should not be treated as permanent.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. Because the displayed return is fee-funded, emission decay would have little direct effect now, but any future incentives could fall as a MEMECOIN campaign ages and should not be treated as permanent.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the remaining return would depend on 0.9% from trading fees. With 100% of current yield sourced from fees, weak volume would leave little support for LP returns after incentives end.
If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and the remaining return would depend on 0.9% from trading fees. With 100% of current yield sourced from fees, weak volume would leave little support for LP returns after incentives end.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because SHIB can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the pool's token balance. The pool also has $79K in liquidity against $363 of daily volume, with a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x, so both price volatility and fee-generation weakness matter.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because SHIB can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the pool's token balance. The pool also has $79K in liquidity against $363 of daily volume, with a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x, so both price volatility and fee-generation weakness matter.
Consider exiting when SHIB volatility rises beyond your range-management capacity, when the position remains out of range, or when volume and liquidity deteriorate enough that fee income no longer compensates for exposure. For SOL-SHIB, a sustained drop in $363 or 0.00x is a concrete warning alongside a TVL drain.
Consider exiting when SHIB volatility rises beyond your range-management capacity, when the position remains out of range, or when volume and liquidity deteriorate enough that fee income no longer compensates for exposure. For SOL-SHIB, a sustained drop in $363 or 0.00x is a concrete warning alongside a TVL drain.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fees of 0.9% can offset divergence losses over time, but the result depends on how long that fee rate persists and how far SOL and SHIB move apart.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. In principle, fees of 0.9% can offset divergence losses over time, but the result depends on how long that fee rate persists and how far SOL and SHIB move apart.
