new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict EXIT is supported by ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and a strong unopposed EXIT signal; its #699-of-2403 rank among raydium-amm pools also places it in a weak relative position. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume raised fee production, liquidity deepened, and the critical scanner signal cleared; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker trading activity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.89K
Total value locked
$683.32
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: withdraw if pool TVL falls materially or if the live verdict remains EXIT while volume-to-liquidity stays at 0.01x; use a narrow range only if you can monitor and rebalance it frequently, since seven-day range data is unavailable.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $683.32 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.71 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 NBT-GDTC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5751 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8837 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NBT-GDTC liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NBT and GDTC into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and the current return depends on limited trading activity rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's total APR of 0.8% decomposes into 0.8% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of yield is sourced from trading fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the stated return. For this MEMECOIN pool, emission decay remains a relevant risk if incentives are introduced or changed: fee generation would need to replace any disappearing emissions, and exit timing matters because low turnover limits fee recovery.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so recent loss from price divergence cannot be quantified; seven-day tick-in-range reporting is also unavailable, leaving range exposure unverified. As a MEMECOIN pool, NBT-GDTC carries elevated divergence, liquidity migration, and price-collapse risk, while emission decay can reduce any future incentive-based return. A low-turnover pool makes exit timing more important because withdrawing after liquidity or demand falls can be costly.
tollNBT Context
NBT is one side of this pool and its price movement relative to GDTC determines the LP's inventory mix and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for NBT outside this pool should be checked separately; thin external markets can amplify slippage and make rebalancing or exiting difficult.
tollGDTC Context
GDTC is the paired asset whose price path relative to NBT drives the pool's composition and LP divergence risk. If GDTC liquidity elsewhere is limited or its market weakens, the pool may see reduced trading activity and less fee generation, leaving LPs more dependent on timely exits.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NBT and GDTC into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the weaker token, and the current return depends on limited trading activity rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 1iq1zSfJ61CF8q7DdDZXXiv9qqjEYuYfJ6m9cwmM3Le
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NBT (6S8PhTWW…)
- Token B
- GDTC (DVb1znJK…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated return is currently driven by 0.8% in fees and 100% fee sustainability. If emissions are added and then decay, APR would fall unless trading volume increases enough to replace them.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated return is currently driven by 0.8% in fees and 100% fee sustainability. If emissions are added and then decay, APR would fall unless trading volume increases enough to replace them.
With reward APR at 0.0%, there is no current reward stream to preserve the total APR. If future incentives expire, LP economics would rely on trading fees of 0.8%; low turnover at 0.01x could then make the position unattractive.
With reward APR at 0.0%, there is no current reward stream to preserve the total APR. If future incentives expire, LP economics would rely on trading fees of 0.8%; low turnover at 0.01x could then make the position unattractive.
Risk is high because NBT and GDTC can diverge sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and memecoin demand can disappear quickly. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, so recent divergence and in-range exposure cannot be verified; the live verdict is EXIT.
Risk is high because NBT and GDTC can diverge sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and memecoin demand can disappear quickly. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range data are unavailable, so recent divergence and in-range exposure cannot be verified; the live verdict is EXIT.
For this pool, predefined triggers should include a material TVL decline, worsening volume-to-liquidity from 0.01x, or persistence of the EXIT verdict alongside a CRITICAL scanner result. Exiting before liquidity and trading activity deteriorate further can reduce slippage and inventory concentration risk.
For this pool, predefined triggers should include a material TVL decline, worsening volume-to-liquidity from 0.01x, or persistence of the EXIT verdict alongside a CRITICAL scanner result. Exiting before liquidity and trading activity deteriorate further can reduce slippage and inventory concentration risk.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on changing volume. At 0.8% fee APR, fees must accumulate long enough to offset any divergence loss, while the 0.0% reward APR provides no additional current offset.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income depends on changing volume. At 0.8% fee APR, fees must accumulate long enough to offset any divergence loss, while the 0.0% reward APR provides no additional current offset.
