new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 54/100 places FEBU-SOL below a neutral-quality profile: Enter is 51/100, Hold is 58/100, and Exit is 25/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. It ranks #408 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools, so it is not among the stronger-ranked alternatives in the protocol set. The ai_engine assessment is hold, but the TVL bleed is severe enough to cap the result at REDUCE; the assessment would improve if TVL stabilized or recovered and fee volume persisted, and worsen if the liquidity drain continued or the fee-driven APR collapsed.
Computed 2026-10-10 01:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.37K
Total value locked
$410.04
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up146.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 135.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range around the current FEBU/SOL price, review it whenever price leaves that range, and exit rather than repeatedly rebalance if the live verdict remains HOLD while TVL continues to bleed or fee volume falls materially.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 146.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 90.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $410.04 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $12.74 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 febu-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 4136 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 135723
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the febu-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FEBU and SOL into a pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset, and the position can become less useful if the pool loses liquidity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 146.2% decomposes into 90.2% fee-only APR and 56.0% reward-only APR. 62% of yield comes from trading fees, so realized returns depend on continued volume and the pool's fee parameters rather than a disclosed reward schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and any future emissions would require separate monitoring for decay and expiry.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so there is no current measured basis for estimating price divergence or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, FEBU-SOL carries sharp token-price and liquidity risks, while concentrated liquidity can become inactive when FEBU moves materially against SOL. Emission decay and exit timing matter even though the current reward component is not indicated: a memecoin pool can lose fee volume and liquidity before a holder has time to react.
tollfebu Context
FEBU is the memecoin side of this pair, and this pool gives LPs direct exposure to FEBU/SOL trading rather than a stable reference asset. Liquidity depth for FEBU elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data; a sharp FEBU move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while a rapid decline in FEBU demand can reduce fees and make exit execution more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the comparatively broader base asset in the pair, but its price movement still changes the FEBU/SOL exchange rate and can move a concentrated position out of range. SOL liquidity elsewhere may support the SOL leg, yet it does not remove FEBU-specific volatility or the risk that this pool's own liquidity contracts. SOL strength or weakness therefore affects both the mark-to-market value of the position and the asset mix received on withdrawal.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FEBU and SOL into a pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker asset, and the position can become less useful if the pool loses liquidity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2CVnAQYvrgTX8rmnRzWCE3Citgbo3kga3M8TeoFsUEJz
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- febu (4ko5tSr5…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/12/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
6%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The stated APR is 146.2%, split between 90.2% in fees and 56.0% in rewards, with 62% of yield from trading fees. Because the current reward component is not indicated, emission decay is not the present source of the quoted APR; any future emissions could decline and leave fee volume as the main return source.
The stated APR is 146.2%, split between 90.2% in fees and 56.0% in rewards, with 62% of yield from trading fees. Because the current reward component is not indicated, emission decay is not the present source of the quoted APR; any future emissions could decline and leave fee volume as the main return source.
There is currently no indicated reward contribution, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a disclosed reward stream from the quoted APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are already the stated source of 62% of yield.
There is currently no indicated reward contribution, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a disclosed reward stream from the quoted APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, which are already the stated source of 62% of yield.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because FEBU can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and inactive concentrated liquidity. The pool also has $2K of TVL, $410 of 24-hour volume, and a reported TVL bleed, so exit liquidity and future fee generation can deteriorate.
Risk is high relative to a stable-asset pool because FEBU can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and inactive concentrated liquidity. The pool also has $2K of TVL, $410 of 24-hour volume, and a reported TVL bleed, so exit liquidity and future fee generation can deteriorate.
For FEBU-SOL, an exit is more defensible when price leaves the chosen range, the live verdict remains HOLD, or TVL continues to fall while fee volume no longer supports 90.2%. Do not treat the stated 146.2% as durable if its fee base is shrinking.
For FEBU-SOL, an exit is more defensible when price leaves the chosen range, the live verdict remains HOLD, or TVL continues to fall while fee volume no longer supports 90.2%. Do not treat the stated 146.2% as durable if its fee base is shrinking.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, and future fee volume is uncertain. Break-even would require accumulated trading fees to exceed the position's price divergence and withdrawal costs; the stated fee-only component is 90.2%, not a guarantee.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, and future fee volume is uncertain. Break-even would require accumulated trading fees to exceed the position's price divergence and withdrawal costs; the stated fee-only component is 90.2%, not a guarantee.
