new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 places this pool in an exit-oriented profile, not a routine hold category. The live verdict is EXIT: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates a low relative standing, consistent with $35K, $100, and 0.00x. The assessment would change if liquidity and sustained volume rose materially, fee generation became persistent, the scanner cleared its critical status, or the pool demonstrated durable activity; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-11-12 17:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.63K
Total value locked
$100.19
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed exit signal as the operational trigger: do not add liquidity while it remains active, and exit or reduce the position if it persists through the next review. If entering despite that condition, use a deliberately narrow range only after checking current prices and set a rebalance rule for any material NOM-SOL divergence; do not rely on unavailable range statistics.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $100.19 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.25 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 NOM-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13265 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19225 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NOM-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOM and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a portion of trading fees, but your final holdings can become more exposed to whichever token falls behind, and the pool's current activity and exit signal make the position difficult to justify on yield alone.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed return is fee-funded rather than dependent on active emissions. Reward dependency is not established, so future emission changes cannot be used to support the current APR; for this MEMECOIN pool, any later emissions decline would leave fee generation as the relevant source of LP return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. The main family-specific risk is MEMECOIN emission decay combined with uncertain liquidity persistence: if attention or incentives fade, exit timing can become more important than the nominal fee APR, especially in a pool with limited observed activity.
tollNOM Context
NOM is the memecoin side of this pair and gives the pool its primary idiosyncratic price risk. The supplied metrics do not establish NOM's liquidity depth elsewhere, so a sharp NOM move can create adverse inventory changes and increase the chance that an LP holds more NOM after traders move its price. NOM price action should therefore be evaluated against the pool's exit liquidity, not only against the quoted APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established settlement asset in this pair, but SOL price movements still change the relative value of the two assets held by an LP. The supplied pool data does not quantify SOL liquidity elsewhere for this specific comparison; a broad SOL move against NOM can produce inventory imbalance even when NOM-specific trading is quiet. SOL strength or weakness can therefore affect the LP's realized outcome through relative price divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NOM and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. In return, you receive a portion of trading fees, but your final holdings can become more exposed to whichever token falls behind, and the pool's current activity and exit signal make the position difficult to justify on yield alone.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2NeA89Teb2wnWZpSbPNWkaHRoR4dDtMJLtP4eY57Ts7S
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- NOM (2MDr15dT…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.1% and total APR is 0.1%. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool with no established reward schedule in the supplied data, emission decay could reduce future rewards, but the displayed return is currently fee-funded.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.1% and total APR is 0.1%. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool with no established reward schedule in the supplied data, emission decay could reduce future rewards, but the displayed return is currently fee-funded.
Since the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently measured reward contribution, but any unreported future incentive would disappear. The remaining modeled return would be 0.1% from fees, subject to the pool's limited trading activity.
Since the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently measured reward contribution, but any unreported future incentive would disappear. The remaining modeled return would be 0.1% from fees, subject to the pool's limited trading activity.
Risk is high relative to a standard asset pair because NOM can move sharply, liquidity may be thin, and the pool has a CRITICAL scanner status with an unopposed EXIT signal. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of those risks cannot be measured.
Risk is high relative to a standard asset pair because NOM can move sharply, liquidity may be thin, and the pool has a CRITICAL scanner status with an unopposed EXIT signal. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of those risks cannot be measured.
For this pool, the current operational signal is to reduce or exit while the live verdict remains EXIT and the scanner remains CRITICAL, particularly if TVL falls or volume fails to improve. A sustained rise in liquidity and fee-generating volume, together with a cleared scanner status, would be evidence to reassess rather than an automatic reason to stay.
For this pool, the current operational signal is to reduce or exit while the live verdict remains EXIT and the scanner remains CRITICAL, particularly if TVL falls or volume fails to improve. A sustained rise in liquidity and fee-generating volume, together with a cleared scanner status, would be evidence to reassess rather than an automatic reason to stay.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the fee stream is based on only $100 of recent volume. With total APR at 0.1%, any recovery from price divergence would depend on sustained future fees and stable relative prices, not a fixed timetable.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the fee stream is based on only $100 of recent volume. With total APR at 0.1%, any recovery from price divergence would depend on sustained future fees and stable relative prices, not a fixed timetable.
