Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 57% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 61/100 places this pool in a selective middle ground: Enter is 58/100, Hold is 66/100, and Exit is 16/100, with the live verdict HOLD and verdict driver ai_engine=hold. Its #76 of 2612 meteora-dlmm ranking indicates that the current fee flow, liquidity, and risk profile compare favorably with many listed pools, but it is not a low-risk position. The assessment would weaken if $414K drains, $959K falls enough to compress 77.3%, or PUMP volatility repeatedly pushes liquidity out of range; stronger retained liquidity and fee generation would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-10-22 12:45 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$413.65K
Total value locked
$959.09K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up116.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 74.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range sized for PUMP's volatility, and rebalance or exit when price reaches either boundary; also reassess the position if pool turnover falls below one full liquidity rotation per day for two consecutive days.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 116.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 77.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $959.09K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $887.50 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 8 PUMP-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#90 of 4333 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1324 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PUMP-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PUMP and SOL into a trading range so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If PUMP and SOL move sharply relative to each other, you may end up with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR is 116.4%, comprising fee-only APR of 77.3% and reward-only APR of 39.1%. Fee sustainability is 66%, so the quoted return is currently generated by trading activity rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; fee income will therefore vary with volume, liquidity, and trader demand.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently in range are not reported, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, PUMP-SOL carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and adverse-selection risk; PUMP-specific emission decay can reduce participation if incentives are introduced, while exit timing matters because a fast move can leave an LP holding mostly the weaker asset. The fee-only structure reduces dependence on emissions but does not remove price divergence or out-of-range risk.
tollPUMP Context
PUMP is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price action is the primary source of divergence risk for the LP. Liquidity depth for PUMP elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; a rapid PUMP move can convert the position toward SOL after arbitrage, while weak PUMP demand can reduce fee generation and make exits more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the base-asset side of the pair and generally has deeper external liquidity than a memecoin, which can support arbitrage and exits. For this LP, SOL strength relative to PUMP can still leave the position concentrated in PUMP as the price moves through the selected range, while SOL weakness can create the opposite inventory effect.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PUMP and SOL into a trading range so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If PUMP and SOL move sharply relative to each other, you may end up with more of the weaker asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2QDGj5BWMSNyEfmyDFx7eEvWWm4KujUPJ38Xdkntvxtd
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PUMP (pumpCmXq…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
5%
APR
1%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows reward-only APR of 39.1% and fee-only APR of 77.3%, with fee sustainability of 66%. If PUMP-SOL later relies on emissions, decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fees dependent on trading volume.
The pool currently shows reward-only APR of 39.1% and fee-only APR of 77.3%, with fee sustainability of 66%. If PUMP-SOL later relies on emissions, decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fees dependent on trading volume.
The reward component would fall to zero when incentives expire, but PUMP-SOL currently reports reward-only APR of 39.1% and total APR of 116.4%, so the present return is already fee-led. Remaining income would depend on swaps and could decline if incentive-driven liquidity or volume leaves.
The reward component would fall to zero when incentives expire, but PUMP-SOL currently reports reward-only APR of 39.1% and total APR of 116.4%, so the present return is already fee-led. Remaining income would depend on swaps and could decline if incentive-driven liquidity or volume leaves.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PUMP can experience abrupt price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid demand changes. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is not reported, so the pool's realized loss behavior cannot be measured from the available data.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PUMP can experience abrupt price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid demand changes. Recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is not reported, so the pool's realized loss behavior cannot be measured from the available data.
Consider exiting when PUMP-SOL repeatedly reaches the edge of your range, when 2.32x turnover deteriorates, or when fee-only APR of 77.3% no longer compensates for the position's price and liquidity risk. A sharp TVL drain or falling daily volume of $959K is also a direct warning that exits may become less efficient.
Consider exiting when PUMP-SOL repeatedly reaches the edge of your range, when 2.32x turnover deteriorates, or when fee-only APR of 77.3% no longer compensates for the position's price and liquidity risk. A sharp TVL drain or falling daily volume of $959K is also a direct warning that exits may become less efficient.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The theoretical comparison is between realized trading fees of 77.3% and the loss created by PUMP-SOL price divergence; 116.4% is an annualized indication, not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The theoretical comparison is between realized trading fees of 77.3% and the loss created by PUMP-SOL price divergence; 116.4% is an annualized indication, not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
