SOL-ZECon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $112.89K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $881.58K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 2TAgfogn…8X9C · observed 2026-08-22
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 57/100 places SOL-ZEC in a middle-ground assessment: Enter is 54/100, Hold is 61/100, and Exit is 21/100. The live verdict is HOLD, with ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #469 of 1049 orca-whirlpool pools. In practical terms, the score supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the pool as a clear new allocation; the fee-only structure is useful while volume persists, but the MEMECOIN classification and unavailable range and loss history limit confidence. A sustained TVL drain, a collapse in volume/TVL, or a sharp reduction in fee APR would change the assessment toward exit; durable liquidity growth and persistent fee generation would support a stronger hold.
Computed 2026-08-22 14:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$112.89K
Total value locked
$881.58K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 126.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a range around the current SOL/ZEC price only if it can be monitored, and rebalance when price leaves that range; otherwise exit if 24-hour volume remains below half of $113K for several consecutive days, because fee generation would no longer be supported by the current liquidity base.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 467.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $881.58K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.41K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 15 SOL-ZEC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#74 of 13395 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #934 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ZEC liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEC into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token in your position changes as prices move, and you can end up with less value than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 467.7% fee APR and 32.3% reward APR. 94% of reported yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward subsidy to cushion a decline in volume. Reward dependency is not established; any future emissions would be an additional, potentially temporary component rather than the current basis of the APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be validated from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZEC is exposed to sharp price moves, thinner liquidity during sell-offs, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay and incentive expiry would reduce support if rewards were introduced, while exit timing matters because leaving during a liquidity contraction can increase price impact.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's primary Solana-native asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than this pool alone. Price moves in SOL can be set by other venues, causing arbitrage and changing the SOL/ZEC balance held by a concentrated-liquidity position. A strong SOL move relative to ZEC can therefore create impermanent loss even when swap fees remain active.
tollZEC Context
ZEC is the pool's less-liquid side relative to SOL and generally has a narrower Solana liquidity footprint. ZEC-specific volatility, cross-venue price gaps, or a reduction in Solana trading activity can move the pool price quickly and make a chosen range obsolete. LP results therefore depend on both ZEC's relative price and the depth available when the position is rebalanced or closed.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEC into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token in your position changes as prices move, and you can end up with less value than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2TAgfogn8JRwwTnsGKUa6WUT5Xdv1iMEzfEDMor68X9C
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ZEC (A7bdiYdS…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
243%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward APR is 32.3%, so the reported 500.0% total APR is currently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay or expiry would lower the reward component while 467.7% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward APR is 32.3%, so the reported 500.0% total APR is currently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay or expiry would lower the reward component while 467.7% would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward contribution: 32.3% reward APR and 94% fee sustainability. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would be determined by swap fees, with 467.7% as the current fee-only component, and the position could become less attractive if volume falls.
There is no current reward contribution: 32.3% reward APR and 94% fee sustainability. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would be determined by swap fees, with 467.7% as the current fee-only component, and the position could become less attractive if volume falls.
Risk is high relative to a broad, deep-liquidity SOL pair because this MEMECOIN pool can experience rapid price changes, liquidity withdrawal, and range displacement. The pool has $113K TVL and 7.81x volume/TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable for assessing realized exposure.
Risk is high relative to a broad, deep-liquidity SOL pair because this MEMECOIN pool can experience rapid price changes, liquidity withdrawal, and range displacement. The pool has $113K TVL and 7.81x volume/TVL, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable for assessing realized exposure.
Consider exiting when the position remains outside its active range, liquidity is draining, or trading activity no longer supports the fee stream. For SOL-ZEC, a sustained drop in volume relative to $113K or a collapse in 467.7% would be a clearer exit signal than the headline 500.0%.
Consider exiting when the position remains outside its active range, liquidity is draining, or trading activity no longer supports the fee stream. For SOL-ZEC, a sustained drop in volume relative to $113K or a collapse in 467.7% would be a clearer exit signal than the headline 500.0%.
No defensible fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Fees accrue at 467.7%, but the time needed to offset price divergence depends on future volume, rebalancing, and how long the position remains in range.
No defensible fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. Fees accrue at 467.7%, but the time needed to offset price divergence depends on future volume, rebalancing, and how long the position remains in range.
