WealthVille
SOL
S
NVDAx
N

SOL-NVDAxon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $43.73K
APR
66.6% APR
24h Volume
$22.27K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
38rXq2BuPMsF · observed 2026-09-05
50D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 53% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter45

new capital

Hold57

keep position

Exit24

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 50/100, with Enter at 45/100, Hold at 57/100, and Exit at 24/100; the live verdict is HOLD from ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #110 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it relatively high in the listed set, but the score supports maintaining or selectively managing exposure rather than treating the quoted APR as durable. A material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; improved liquidity and persistent fee generation would strengthen it.

Computed 2026-09-05 07:23 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$43.73K

Total value locked

$22.27K

24h volume

×0.5 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

66.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

61.8%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 68m agoTVL 1.2%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 77% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 65/100
tips_and_updates

Enter only with a range you can monitor actively, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range or when pool volume falls materially without a corresponding reduction in your position size.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR66.6%
Fee APR51.1%
Volume$22.27K
Fees Earned$55.67

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
73.1%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−11.3%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
61.8%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.51x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0013
Fee APR Sustainability
77% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 7 SOL-NVDAx pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#165 of 14926 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1341 of 107256

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NVDAx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NVDAX into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one token as prices move, and the fee income can fall if trading activity declines.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield is decomposed into a fee-only APR of 51.1% and a reward-only APR of 15.5%. Fee sustainability is 77%, so the current yield depends on trading activity rather than emissions; reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry estimate is available.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss results and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NVDAX also carries demand and liquidity-migration risk: emission programs can decay, and exit timing matters because volume can disappear before an LP can rebalance or close efficiently.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset in this pool and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a typical memecoin pair. A large SOL move relative to NVDAX changes the pool composition and can leave a concentrated-range LP holding more of the depreciating side after rebalancing.

tollNVDAx Context

NVDAX is the memecoin-side asset, so its price discovery, liquidity, and demand are likely more pool-specific than SOL's. A sharp NVDAX decline or migration of trading activity can increase inventory imbalance, reduce fee generation, and make exits more price-sensitive.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NVDAX into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one token as prices move, and the fee income can fall if trading activity declines.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

NVDAx
NVDAxNVIDIA xStockSolana
Explorer

NVIDIA xStock (NVDAx) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
38rXq2BuwdNcfnwydw6S2srpNK9N4gVzf39f69suPMsF
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
NVDAx (Xsc9qvGR…)
Created
4/20/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 15.5%, while the fee-only APR is 51.1%. Emission decay therefore does not currently account for the stated yield, but any future reward component would decline as distributions are reduced or exhausted.

The current reward-only APR is 15.5%, while the fee-only APR is 51.1%. Emission decay therefore does not currently account for the stated yield, but any future reward component would decline as distributions are reduced or exhausted.

With reward-only APR at 15.5% and fee sustainability at 77%, expiration of incentives would not remove the current fee source, but it could reduce total APR if rewards are introduced later. The remaining return would depend on swap volume and fee generation.

With reward-only APR at 15.5% and fee sustainability at 77%, expiration of incentives would not remove the current fee source, but it could reduce total APR if rewards are introduced later. The remaining return would depend on swap volume and fee generation.

The main risks are SOL-NVDAX price divergence, concentrated-range exposure, thin pool liquidity, and a rapid loss of NVDAX trading demand. Memecoin emissions and attention can decay quickly, so an LP may face both inventory imbalance and a difficult exit even when the quoted fee APR is high.

The main risks are SOL-NVDAX price divergence, concentrated-range exposure, thin pool liquidity, and a rapid loss of NVDAX trading demand. Memecoin emissions and attention can decay quickly, so an LP may face both inventory imbalance and a difficult exit even when the quoted fee APR is high.

Use a sustained drop in pool volume, a material TVL drain, price movement outside your active range, or a sharp decline in 51.1% as exit or rebalance signals. Do not rely on the current 66.6% alone if fee generation is no longer persistent.

Use a sustained drop in pool volume, a material TVL drain, price movement outside your active range, or a sharp decline in 51.1% as exit or rebalance signals. Do not rely on the current 66.6% alone if fee generation is no longer persistent.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is unavailable. 51.1% is an annualized estimate that can fall with volume, so it should not be treated as a guaranteed schedule for recovering price divergence.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-occupancy history is unavailable. 51.1% is an annualized estimate that can fall with volume, so it should not be treated as a guaranteed schedule for recovering price divergence.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights