SOL-GOOGLxon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $98.32K
- APR
- 51.4% APR
- 24h Volume
- $10.07K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 3P1PwneD…DbSB · observed 2026-10-28
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 50/100 produces an asymmetric profile: Enter is 43/100, Hold is 58/100, and Exit is 22/100, with the live verdict HOLD driven by ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1311 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, which places it above many listed pools but does not remove its memecoin, concentration, and liquidity risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses; it would improve only if fee generation persists while liquidity and price-range stability strengthen.
Computed 2026-10-28 07:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$98.32K
Total value locked
$10.07K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up51.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 48.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range centered on the current SOL-GOOGLX price, monitor it at least daily, and rebalance or exit when price leaves the range or when volume/TVL falls materially below 0.10x; do not wait for an unconfirmed incentive schedule to justify staying.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 51.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 41.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $10.07K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $100.70 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 9 SOL-GOOGLx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#994 of 19676 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8736 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GOOGLx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOOGLX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with more of one token, suffer losses from large price moves, or be unable to earn fees if the price leaves your chosen range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into 41.5% from trading fees and 9.9% from rewards, with 81% of yield attributed to fees. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established, while the current reward contribution is zero; therefore, emission decay is not the immediate APR driver. The fee APR depends on continued volume relative to liquidity and can fall quickly if trading activity or TVL changes.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and the percentage of time ticks remained in range are unavailable, so recent divergence risk and range efficiency cannot be quantified from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GOOGLX is exposed to abrupt GOOGLX repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and adverse selection during volatile moves; a concentrated position can also stop earning fees after price leaves its range. Emission timing is unclear, so LPs should assume that any future incentive schedule could decay quickly and use a shorter exit horizon than for a major-asset pair.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid base asset in this pool and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than GOOGLX. SOL price moves against GOOGLX determine the pool's inventory shift: a sustained SOL rally or decline can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset and increase divergence loss.
tollGOOGLx Context
GOOGLX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity, price discovery, and exit depth should be treated as uncertain relative to SOL. A sharp GOOGLX move can push price outside a concentrated range, reduce fee collection, and make rebalancing or withdrawal more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOOGLX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with more of one token, suffer losses from large price moves, or be unable to earn fees if the price leaves your chosen range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3P1PwneDrKfyUVQstaqAQDBWnK2Mcqi1xZ9nteMhDbSB
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GOOGLx (XsCPL9dN…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is composed of 41.5% in fees and 9.9% in rewards, so present yield does not rely on emissions. Because the reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, any later emissions could decay without a reliable way to forecast their contribution.
The current APR is composed of 41.5% in fees and 9.9% in rewards, so present yield does not rely on emissions. Because the reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, any later emissions could decay without a reliable way to forecast their contribution.
There is currently no reward contribution in the displayed APR, so expiration would not remove the current reward component. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees at 41.5%, which can decline if volume falls relative to $98K.
There is currently no reward contribution in the displayed APR, so expiration would not remove the current reward component. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees at 41.5%, which can decline if volume falls relative to $98K.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because GOOGLX can reprice abruptly and have thinner exit liquidity. The pool has $98K TVL and a 0.10x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because GOOGLX can reprice abruptly and have thinner exit liquidity. The pool has $98K TVL and a 0.10x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Exit or rebalance when price leaves the active range, when GOOGLX liquidity deteriorates, or when volume falls materially below the current 0.10x relationship to TVL. A fee-funded position should not be held solely on the assumption that future emissions will appear.
Exit or rebalance when price leaves the active range, when GOOGLX liquidity deteriorates, or when volume falls materially below the current 0.10x relationship to TVL. A fee-funded position should not be held solely on the assumption that future emissions will appear.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are unavailable. At 41.5%, a simple gross-fee estimate might suggest roughly one year divided by the annual fee rate, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, fees, and withdrawal costs.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are unavailable. At 41.5%, a simple gross-fee estimate might suggest roughly one year divided by the annual fee rate, but actual recovery depends on price divergence, time in range, fees, and withdrawal costs.
