WealthVille
TripleT
T
SOL
S

TripleT-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $60.80K
APR
500.0% APR
24h Volume
$42.64K 24h vol
Pool address
3WY9N19n…nDgY · observed 2026-11-08
55C · Fair

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 55% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter50

new capital

Hold61

keep position

Exit21

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 55/100, with Enter at 50/100, Hold at 61/100, and Exit at 21/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the pool ranks #317 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. With ai_engine=hold as the stated verdict driver, this indicates a position better treated as conditional rather than clearly attractive: fee generation is present, but memecoin volatility, limited pool size, and unreported range and loss history constrain conviction. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, falling volume-to-liquidity activity, or collapse in fee APR, and improve only if fee flow persists while liquidity and trading depth strengthen.

Computed 2026-11-08 22:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$60.80K

Total value locked

$42.64K

24h volume

×0.7 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

500.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 198.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 24m agoTVL ↓6.1%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately monitored active band and rebalance when TRIPLET leaves that band or when fee flow weakens materially relative to the position's capital; exit rather than widening the range automatically if the move is accompanied by a visible TVL drain.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR500.0%——
Fee APR232.5%——
Volume$42.64K——
Fees Earned$443.98——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
266.5%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−68.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
198.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.70x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0073
Fee APR Sustainability
47% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 5 TripleT-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#147 of 4597 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1449 of 155680

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the TripleT-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing TRIPLET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token and make your result worse than simply holding both.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The quoted APR decomposes into 232.5% from trading fees and 267.5% from rewards, with 47% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, but the current reward component contributes nothing to the displayed APR, so emission decay is not presently the main return risk; future incentives should not be assumed.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that stayed in range are not reported, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from this dataset. As a MEMECOIN pool, TRIPLET-SOL carries elevated risk of sharp price divergence, declining swap flow, and reduced exit liquidity. Emission decay matters if incentives are introduced later, while exit timing matters because a fee-only return can fall quickly when memecoin attention and volume leave the pool.

tollTripleT Context

TRIPLET is the memecoin side of this pair and its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the available pool metrics. If TRIPLET appreciates or falls sharply against SOL, the position's token mix shifts toward the underperforming asset, while thin external liquidity can increase slippage when exiting.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the reference asset against which TRIPLET's price movement is measured in this pool. SOL's broader market liquidity may make it easier to sell than TRIPLET, but a large TRIPLET-SOL price move still changes the LP inventory and can create divergence loss relative to simply holding both assets.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing TRIPLET and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token and make your result worse than simply holding both.

token

Token Details

TripleT
TripleTTung Tung Tung SahurSolana
Explorer

Tung Tung Tung Sahur (TripleT) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
3WY9N19nTtPSqrbWTeaFn2HfJ9MfdyLRSrRvy97GnDgY
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
TripleT (J8PSdNP3…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only component is 267.5%, so the displayed 500.0% is currently driven by 232.5% in trading fees. If emissions are added or later reduced, the reward portion would change, but fee income would still depend on trading volume.

The current reward-only component is 267.5%, so the displayed 500.0% is currently driven by 232.5% in trading fees. If emissions are added or later reduced, the reward portion would change, but fee income would still depend on trading volume.

The current pool already shows 267.5% in reward APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently visible reward component. The remaining return would be fee-based at 232.5%, which can decline if volume or liquidity changes.

The current pool already shows 267.5% in reward APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently visible reward component. The remaining return would be fee-based at 232.5%, which can decline if volume or liquidity changes.

Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because TRIPLET can move sharply against SOL and external liquidity may be limited. The pool has $61K in liquidity, produces $43K in recent volume, and its realized impermanent-loss history is not reported.

Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because TRIPLET can move sharply against SOL and external liquidity may be limited. The pool has $61K in liquidity, produces $43K in recent volume, and its realized impermanent-loss history is not reported.

Consider exiting when TRIPLET leaves the selected active range, when fee flow drops materially, or when TVL drains and selling becomes harder. A weakening fee-only return from 232.5% is a more relevant exit signal here than waiting for reward emissions.

Consider exiting when TRIPLET leaves the selected active range, when fee flow drops materially, or when TVL drains and selling becomes harder. A weakening fee-only return from 232.5% is a more relevant exit signal here than waiting for reward emissions.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are not reported. Fees accrue at the displayed 232.5% rate only if volume persists, so that annualized figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery time.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range persistence are not reported. Fees accrue at the displayed 232.5% rate only if volume persists, so that annualized figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery time.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights