ENA-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $58.10K
- APR
- 325.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $21.90K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 3bQrB8o5…YadP · observed 2026-11-11
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 57/100 assigns Enter 51/100, Hold 65/100, and Exit 15/100, producing a live verdict of HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1278 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above most ranked pools, but the hold signal indicates that this standing is not a clear entry signal: the case rests on current fee activity rather than rewards. A sustained TVL drain, lower trading activity, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; improved depth and durable volume would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-11-11 08:46 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$58.10K
Total value locked
$21.90K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up325.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 96.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current ENA-USDC price, review it at least daily, and rebalance or exit when price reaches either boundary or when fee generation no longer compensates for the position's increasing one-sided exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 325.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 145.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $21.90K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $221.19 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 6 ENA-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#451 of 20367 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3028 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ENA-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ENA and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If ENA moves sharply or leaves your chosen range, your holdings can become unbalanced and your result can be worse than simply holding the two tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 145.0% fee APR and 180.2% reward APR, with fee sustainability of 45%. Reward dependency cannot be established from the available data, so the stated return should be evaluated primarily as compensation for facilitating trades; any change in ENA-USDC volume or liquidity can reduce the fee component.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss exposure and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, ENA-USDC is exposed to sharp ENA price moves, liquidity migration, and adverse range displacement; emission decay and uncertain incentive timing make exit discipline more important than relying on a displayed APR.
tollENA Context
ENA is the volatile asset in this pair, so an ENA rally or selloff changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding ENA and USDC. Liquidity depth for ENA elsewhere is not supplied here; thinner external markets would increase the effect of price gaps and make concentrated-range management more consequential.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable quote asset, providing the relatively less volatile side of the ENA-USDC position. Broader USDC liquidity can support routing, but cross-venue depth is not supplied; for this LP, ENA volatility and the pool's own liquidity determine how quickly the position becomes one-sided.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ENA and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If ENA moves sharply or leaves your chosen range, your holdings can become unbalanced and your result can be worse than simply holding the two tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3bQrB8o51WXxYisoNZm5bKWg7MZ5vpH8sqfbEUqPYadP
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- ENA (72QvBVwp…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is represented by 325.2%, decomposed into 145.0% from fees and 180.2% from rewards. Because 45% of yield is fee-funded, emission decay has limited direct effect now, but any future reward component would decline as incentives decay.
The current return is represented by 325.2%, decomposed into 145.0% from fees and 180.2% from rewards. Because 45% of yield is fee-funded, emission decay has limited direct effect now, but any future reward component would decline as incentives decay.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of LP yield. For ENA-USDC, that means the position would depend on trading activity behind 145.0% rather than an incentive schedule; no reliable reward-expiry timeline is available.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the remaining source of LP yield. For ENA-USDC, that means the position would depend on trading activity behind 145.0% rather than an incentive schedule; no reliable reward-expiry timeline is available.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, ENA price volatility, limited stated TVL of $58K, and uncertain range behavior. The pool's 0.38x turnover may generate fees, but it does not remove impermanent loss, liquidity-migration, or one-sided-inventory risk.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, ENA price volatility, limited stated TVL of $58K, and uncertain range behavior. The pool's 0.38x turnover may generate fees, but it does not remove impermanent loss, liquidity-migration, or one-sided-inventory risk.
For ENA-USDC, consider exiting when ENA reaches a range boundary, trading activity weakens enough to reduce 145.0%, or pool liquidity begins draining from $58K. These signals matter more than maintaining exposure to a displayed 325.2% if the fee base is deteriorating.
For ENA-USDC, consider exiting when ENA reaches a range boundary, trading activity weakens enough to reduce 145.0%, or pool liquidity begins draining from $58K. These signals matter more than maintaining exposure to a displayed 325.2% if the fee base is deteriorating.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. Fees currently represented by 145.0% may offset losses, but the time required depends on ENA's path, rebalancing, and whether trading volume persists.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. Fees currently represented by 145.0% may offset losses, but the time required depends on ENA's path, rebalancing, and whether trading volume persists.
