WealthVille
SOL
S
$URO
$

SOL-$UROon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $103.46K
APR
0.0% APR
24h Volume
$14.71 24h vol
Pool address
3hsdbMFs…veQT · observed 2026-11-05
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That result is consistent with ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and an unopposed strong EXIT signal, placing the pool at rank #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools rather than among the stronger alternatives. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee-generating volume, deeper or more stable liquidity, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain, weaker volume, or reward and fee yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.

Computed 2026-11-02 14:10 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$103.46K

Total value locked

$14.71

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -0.2%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 4059m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 87/100
tips_and_updates

Treat this as an actively managed position: enter only with a predefined withdrawal rule, and exit if the live verdict remains EXIT or if the pool's Vol/TVL ratio stays at 0.00x while fee income fails to improve.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.0%——
Fee APR0.0%——
Volume$14.71——
Fees Earned$0.04——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.1%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.3%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-0.2%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 3.1x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 SOL-$URO pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#13770 of 95936 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 13% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19917 of 153992

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$URO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $URO into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, but the value of your deposit can change as either token moves and may be difficult to withdraw at a favorable price.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Total APR decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the stated return does not depend on reported emissions. Reward dependency is unknown, and no reliable reward-duration estimate is available; any future incentive decay would reduce the reward component without necessarily improving fee income.

shieldRisk Assessment

A seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range reading are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$URO carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and exit-slippage risk beyond the normal two-asset LP exposure. Emission decay and exit timing are material: with reward dependency unknown, an LP should not assume current economics persist and should reassess when incentives change or trading activity weakens.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than $URO. SOL price movements against $URO change the pool balance and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets, while SOL liquidity elsewhere may make the SOL side easier to hedge or exit.

toll$URO Context

$URO is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to determine much of the pair's volatility and practical exit liquidity. A sharp $URO move against SOL can increase rebalancing and impermanent-loss pressure, while thin external liquidity can make withdrawing or hedging the position more costly.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $URO into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, but the value of your deposit can change as either token moves and may be difficult to withdraw at a favorable price.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

$URO
$UROUrolithin ASolana
Explorer

Urolithin A ($URO) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
3hsdbMFsiCh3YCsXoFjgx4TVpxECsUE9nRMgvaoyveQT
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
$URO (FvgqHMfL…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward component is 0.0%, while reward dependency is unknown. If emissions decay, the total APR would move closer to the fee component of 0.0% unless trading volume and fee generation increase.

The current reward component is 0.0%, while reward dependency is unknown. If emissions decay, the total APR would move closer to the fee component of 0.0% unless trading volume and fee generation increase.

If incentives expire, the reward portion would fall away and the remaining return would depend on 0.0% in trading fees. Because fee sustainability is 100%, the pool is not currently relying on reported rewards to generate its stated yield.

If incentives expire, the reward portion would fall away and the remaining return would depend on 0.0% in trading fees. Because fee sustainability is 100%, the pool is not currently relying on reported rewards to generate its stated yield.

Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because $URO can be volatile and less liquid. The pool also has a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, so limited trading activity may not provide much fee income or reliable exit liquidity.

Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because $URO can be volatile and less liquid. The pool also has a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, so limited trading activity may not provide much fee income or reliable exit liquidity.

For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or fee-generating volume does not improve from the current Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x. Emission changes, a TVL drain, or worsening $URO liquidity are additional reasons to reassess before withdrawal conditions deteriorate.

For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or fee-generating volume does not improve from the current Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x. Emission changes, a TVL drain, or worsening $URO liquidity are additional reasons to reassess before withdrawal conditions deteriorate.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick utilization are not available. The only current reference is fee income of 0.0%, and the low Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x does not provide evidence that fees will quickly offset price-divergence losses.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick utilization are not available. The only current reference is fee income of 0.0%, and the low Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x does not provide evidence that fees will quickly offset price-divergence losses.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights