new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A 43/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 39/100, Hold 49/100, and Exit 31/100, places this pool closer to an exit assessment than an entry assessment. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by an ai_engine hold signal combined with a 86/100 risk score and weak yield. Its #602-of-2403 rank among raydium-amm pools indicates a lower-ranked opportunity within the tracked set, not a standalone safety measure. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume supporting fee APR, stable or growing TVL, and lower assessed risk; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would make the case weaker.
Computed 2026-08-19 19:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$3.14M
Total value locked
$342.44K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up10.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 13.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set an exit trigger if fee-only APR falls to half of 9.8% for two consecutive days, or if the pool's rolling 0.11x declines materially while TVL also contracts. Do not widen a range to compensate for missing activity; reassess the position when updated range and volume data become available.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 10.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 9.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $342.44K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $856.10 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 13 SOL-ZEREBRO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1310 of 52151 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3495 of 93052
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ZEREBRO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEREBRO into a shared pool so other people can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the two token prices move differently, you may withdraw a different mix of assets and be worth less than simply holding them, and the current return depends on fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 10.3% decomposes into 9.8% from trading fees and 0.5% from rewards. 95% of the stated yield comes from fees, while reward dependency is not established beyond the current reward allocation. Because this is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary: emission decay can reduce APR and may require earlier exit timing if volume does not replace the lost subsidy.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unavailable, so the realized price-divergence and range-management burden cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZEREBRO is exposed to abrupt ZEREBRO repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid volume deterioration. Emissions, if introduced, can decay before market activity becomes self-sustaining, so exit timing should follow fee generation and liquidity conditions rather than headline APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired with ZEREBRO and supplies the pool with exposure to Solana's principal native asset. SOL generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana, so a SOL price move can make the pool's two-asset composition diverge even when the position remains active. A sharp SOL move against ZEREBRO can increase the amount of one asset withdrawn relative to the amount deposited.
tollZEREBRO Context
ZEREBRO is the memecoin-side asset and is the primary source of idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk in this pair. Its market depth may be materially thinner than SOL's across Solana, so sudden buying or selling can move the pool price and increase rebalancing costs. A sustained ZEREBRO decline can leave the LP with greater ZEREBRO exposure after arbitrage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEREBRO into a shared pool so other people can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the two token prices move differently, you may withdraw a different mix of assets and be worth less than simply holding them, and the current return depends on fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3sjNoCnkkhWPVXYGDtem8rCciHSGc9jSFZuUAzKbvRVp
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ZEREBRO (8x5VqbHA…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
63%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 9.8% in fees and 0.5% in rewards, so fee generation is the relevant support for the stated return. If future emissions are added and then decay, the total APR can fall unless trading volume produces enough fees to replace them.
The current APR is split between 9.8% in fees and 0.5% in rewards, so fee generation is the relevant support for the stated return. If future emissions are added and then decay, the total APR can fall unless trading volume produces enough fees to replace them.
With reward APR at 0.5%, the current stated yield does not rely on a material reward component. If incentives are introduced later and expire, the remaining return would depend on 9.8% in trading fees, while LPs would still face the pool's price-divergence and liquidity risks.
With reward APR at 0.5%, the current stated yield does not rely on a material reward component. If incentives are introduced later and expire, the remaining return would depend on 9.8% in trading fees, while LPs would still face the pool's price-divergence and liquidity risks.
The pool carries a 86/100 risk score and pairs relatively liquid SOL exposure with the more idiosyncratic ZEREBRO asset. Low or falling volume can reduce fee income, while a large price move in either asset can leave the LP with an unfavorable asset mix.
The pool carries a 86/100 risk score and pairs relatively liquid SOL exposure with the more idiosyncratic ZEREBRO asset. Low or falling volume can reduce fee income, while a large price move in either asset can leave the LP with an unfavorable asset mix.
For SOL-ZEREBRO, consider exiting when fee-only APR falls materially below 9.8%, when 0.11x weakens alongside TVL, or when incentives are decaying without corresponding trading activity. A persistent HOLD verdict is an additional signal to require stronger evidence before remaining exposed.
For SOL-ZEREBRO, consider exiting when fee-only APR falls materially below 9.8%, when 0.11x weakens alongside TVL, or when incentives are decaying without corresponding trading activity. A persistent HOLD verdict is an additional signal to require stronger evidence before remaining exposed.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 9.8%, but they offset price-divergence losses only if that fee income persists and the position remains liquid enough to exit.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 9.8%, but they offset price-divergence losses only if that fee income persists and the position remains liquid enough to exit.
