new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 combines an Enter score of 48/100, Hold score of 55/100, and Exit score of 27/100; with verdict HOLD and verdict driver ai_engine=hold, the practical interpretation is to retain exposure only while fee generation and liquidity remain intact, rather than add solely because the APR is fee-funded. Its rank of #1114 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish low risk or superior returns. A TVL drain, sustained volume deterioration, or collapse in 130.8% would weaken the hold assessment, while durable fee volume and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-10-22 12:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.96M
Total value locked
$2.67M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up130.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 144.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Reassess or reduce the position if the pool's Vol/TVL ratio remains materially below 0.90x for several sessions, or if TVL falls while the fee APR declines; do not treat the current fee rate as durable without corresponding swap activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 130.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 83.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.67M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.66K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 13 SOL-ZEREBRO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#816 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1200 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ZEREBRO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEREBRO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in price, and the pool currently has no reward-based APR to offset that risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 83.7% fee APR and 47.0% reward APR, with 64% of yield coming from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, but the current reward component does not contribute to the stated APR; future returns therefore depend primarily on sustained swap volume and retained liquidity rather than emission payments.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range data are not reported, so recent divergence risk and range utilization cannot be quantified from this record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ZEREBRO is exposed to sharp ZEREBRO price moves, liquidity withdrawals, and slippage during exits; emission decay is not the main current risk because the reward component is absent, but exit timing matters if volume or liquidity contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than ZEREBRO. For this LP, a SOL price move changes the relative inventory held by the pool; a large move against ZEREBRO can increase exposure to the weaker-performing side and create impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollZEREBRO Context
ZEREBRO is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to have thinner, more fragmented liquidity than SOL across venues. Its price action is therefore the main source of idiosyncratic risk: a rapid repricing, weak external demand, or impaired exit liquidity can affect both inventory value and the feasibility of rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ZEREBRO into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that falls in price, and the pool currently has no reward-based APR to offset that risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3sjNoCnkkhWPVXYGDtem8rCciHSGc9jSFZuUAzKbvRVp
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ZEREBRO (8x5VqbHA…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
18%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently the main APR driver because reward APR is 47.0% and 64% of yield comes from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced, their decay would reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.
Emission decay is not currently the main APR driver because reward APR is 47.0% and 64% of yield comes from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced, their decay would reduce the reward component without directly changing fee income.
The current reward component is 47.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a material stated reward stream at present. LP returns would continue to depend on 83.7% and the volume generated by traders.
The current reward component is 47.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a material stated reward stream at present. LP returns would continue to depend on 83.7% and the volume generated by traders.
Risk is material because ZEREBRO can move sharply relative to SOL, causing impermanent loss and potentially weaker exit liquidity. The pool has TVL of $3.0M and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.90x, so fee income depends on that activity continuing.
Risk is material because ZEREBRO can move sharply relative to SOL, causing impermanent loss and potentially weaker exit liquidity. The pool has TVL of $3.0M and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.90x, so fee income depends on that activity continuing.
For this pool, an exit signal is a sustained decline in volume or TVL, especially if 130.8% falls as the Vol/TVL ratio weakens. A rapid ZEREBRO repricing or deteriorating liquidity can also justify exiting before execution costs increase.
For this pool, an exit signal is a sustained decline in volume or TVL, especially if 130.8% falls as the Vol/TVL ratio weakens. A rapid ZEREBRO repricing or deteriorating liquidity can also justify exiting before execution costs increase.
It cannot be estimated reliably from this record because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported and realized fees vary with volume. At a stable annualized fee rate of 83.7%, a simple fee accumulation estimate would be roughly the inverse of 83.7%, but actual break-even also depends on SOL-ZEREBRO price divergence, withdrawals, and compounding.
It cannot be estimated reliably from this record because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported and realized fees vary with volume. At a stable annualized fee rate of 83.7%, a simple fee accumulation estimate would be roughly the inverse of 83.7%, but actual break-even also depends on SOL-ZEREBRO price divergence, withdrawals, and compounding.
