new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 places this pool in a middling overall position: Enter is 39/100, Hold is 48/100, and Exit is 34/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #523 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools. In practical terms, that supports retaining or monitoring an existing position rather than treating the score as a strong entry signal. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR or volume, worsening price divergence, or evidence that liquidity is no longer remaining active would change the assessment toward exit; sustained fee volume and stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-10-09 22:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$217.15K
Total value locked
$313.16K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 237.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a monitored range and rebalance when the market reaches the outer third of that range; exit rather than widen indefinitely if volume weakens while TVL contracts, since the pool has no current reward stream to compensate for inactive liquidity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 284.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $313.16K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.49K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 MET-JUP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#88 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1199 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-JUP liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and JUP into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price differences between MET and JUP can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse, and there are currently no rewards supplementing those fees.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 500.0% decomposes into 284.6% fee-only APR and 215.4% reward-only APR. 57% of yield comes from trading fees, making realized returns dependent on future volume, fee tiers, and the amount of time liquidity remains in range. No active reward contribution is reflected, and no reliable reward-expiry schedule is established; if emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the non-fee component first.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and the seven-day tick-in-range percentage is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency and loss offset cannot be quantified from the supplied data. This is a memecoin pool: MET price shocks, JUP price moves, and abrupt changes in their relative price can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. With no current reward component, exit timing should be based on fee generation, volume persistence, price divergence, and liquidity withdrawal rather than waiting for emissions to recover losses.
tollMET Context
MET is one side of this pool, so providing liquidity converts part of the position into an automated inventory of MET and JUP around the selected price range. MET liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by this pool's figures; thin external liquidity can amplify price impact and make MET price moves more damaging to the LP's inventory. A sharp MET move relative to JUP can also increase impermanent loss and push the position out of range.
tollJUP Context
JUP is the second asset and provides the reference side against which MET is priced in this pool. Its liquidity depth elsewhere should be assessed separately, because stronger or weaker JUP price action changes the pool's price path even when MET is unchanged. A sustained JUP move relative to MET can concentrate the LP in the underperforming asset and reduce fee generation if the position leaves its active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and JUP into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price differences between MET and JUP can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse, and there are currently no rewards supplementing those fees.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3xNGdc58axYtrJ64STQz5TrdQWVtWHLR888iRBbWZnEe
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- JUP (JUPyiwrY…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
6%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 215.4%, so the stated 500.0% APR is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component while 284.6% would continue to depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 215.4%, so the stated 500.0% APR is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component while 284.6% would continue to depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in 215.4%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream from the stated APR. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 284.6%, subject to future volume and time in range.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in 215.4%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream from the stated APR. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 284.6%, subject to future volume and time in range.
Risk is elevated because MET can experience abrupt price moves and liquidity can contract quickly, while the pool has $217K against $313K of recent volume. Impermanent-loss history and recent tick-in-range performance are not available here, so the effect of MET-JUP divergence cannot be estimated from the supplied seven-day metrics.
Risk is elevated because MET can experience abrupt price moves and liquidity can contract quickly, while the pool has $217K against $313K of recent volume. Impermanent-loss history and recent tick-in-range performance are not available here, so the effect of MET-JUP divergence cannot be estimated from the supplied seven-day metrics.
For MET-JUP, consider exiting when fee volume or 1.44x deteriorates alongside falling liquidity, when price approaches the edge of your range and cannot be monitored, or when MET's price action creates a position dominated by the weaker asset. Do not rely on reward continuation, since the current reward-only APR is 215.4%.
For MET-JUP, consider exiting when fee volume or 1.44x deteriorates alongside falling liquidity, when price approaches the edge of your range and cannot be monitored, or when MET's price action creates a position dominated by the weaker asset. Do not rely on reward continuation, since the current reward-only APR is 215.4%.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and fee income changes with volume and range placement. The relevant offset is 284.6%, but that rate should not be treated as constant; compare accumulated fees with the position's current inventory value and the MET-JUP price divergence.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and fee income changes with volume and range placement. The relevant offset is 284.6%, but that rate should not be treated as constant; compare accumulated fees with the position's current inventory value and the MET-JUP price divergence.
