new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 48/100, with Enter at 42/100, Hold at 55/100, and Exit at 26/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #281 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools. That combination describes a middle-to-upper-ranked pool worth retaining only while fee production and liquidity remain intact, not a blanket signal to add capital. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell materially, or 112.0% collapsed; it would strengthen if fee generation persisted with deeper liquidity and improved range data.
Computed 2026-08-23 20:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.65K
Total value locked
$18.91K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up112.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 74.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor, and rebalance or exit when the position becomes substantially one-sided or when 24h volume no longer supports the fee rate represented by 75.2%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 112.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 75.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $18.91K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $85.62 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 MET-JUP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#205 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #971 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-JUP liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and JUP into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a share of their fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the token that has performed worse.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 75.2% fee APR and 36.8% reward APR, with 67% of yield coming from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the current APR should be evaluated primarily as compensation for facilitating swaps rather than as a dependable emissions stream. No reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent range efficiency and realized divergence cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET-JUP carries elevated token-price, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-timing risk; a sharp move in either asset can leave the LP holding mostly the weaker token, while declining activity can make repositioning less effective. The reported TVL also leaves less depth than larger Solana pools may provide.
tollMET Context
MET is one side of this pool and therefore determines part of the LP's exposure to memecoin price movement relative to JUP. The supplied metrics do not establish MET's liquidity depth elsewhere; a rapid MET repricing can create divergence loss and shift the position toward MET or JUP as the active range is traversed.
tollJUP Context
JUP is the other side of the pair and provides the reference asset against which MET's price is continuously measured. JUP's broader liquidity depth is not established by these pool metrics, but changes in JUP relative to MET can move the LP out of its active range and alter the inventory held by the position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and JUP into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool, and you receive a share of their fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the token that has performed worse.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3xNGdc58axYtrJ64STQz5TrdQWVtWHLR888iRBbWZnEe
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- JUP (JUPyiwrY…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
28%
APR
209%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently the reported source of MET-JUP's yield: 36.8% is reward APR and 75.2% is fee APR. If incentives are added or later reduced, the reward component would change, but current yield is reported as 67% fee-funded.
Emission decay is not currently the reported source of MET-JUP's yield: 36.8% is reward APR and 75.2% is fee APR. If incentives are added or later reduced, the reward component would change, but current yield is reported as 67% fee-funded.
Because the current reward component is 36.8%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove the reported reward contribution at present. The remaining yield would depend on trading activity and could decline if fees do not continue at the level reflected by 75.2%.
Because the current reward component is 36.8%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove the reported reward contribution at present. The remaining yield would depend on trading activity and could decline if fees do not continue at the level reflected by 75.2%.
The risk is substantial because MET can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the LP may become concentrated in the weaker asset. The pool's reported TVL of $36K and unavailable recent loss and range-history readings make position sizing and exit timing important.
The risk is substantial because MET can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the LP may become concentrated in the weaker asset. The pool's reported TVL of $36K and unavailable recent loss and range-history readings make position sizing and exit timing important.
For MET-JUP, review an exit when the position becomes one-sided, pool volume weakens relative to $36K, or the fee rate no longer compensates for the risk of holding MET and JUP. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in 112.0% would also invalidate the current hold assessment.
For MET-JUP, review an exit when the position becomes one-sided, pool volume weakens relative to $36K, or the fee rate no longer compensates for the risk of holding MET and JUP. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in 112.0% would also invalidate the current hold assessment.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future MET-JUP price divergence is unknown. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 75.2%, but that gross rate only offsets the loss if trading fees exceed the position's realized divergence and withdrawal costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future MET-JUP price divergence is unknown. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 75.2%, but that gross rate only offsets the loss if trading fees exceed the position's realized divergence and withdrawal costs.
