new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. With ai_engine=hold as the stated verdict driver, the assessment is to retain exposure only conditionally rather than add aggressively. The pool ranks #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, placing it ahead of many listed pools but not establishing that its low turnover or liquidity risk is favorable versus every alternative. A material TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse of the fee-funded APR would weaken the assessment; sustained fee volume and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-11-06 00:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.43K
Total value locked
$4.25
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 6.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit condition tied to this pool: withdraw if TVL drains materially, swap activity weakens further, or either token begins trading with persistent one-sided pressure; do not leave the position unattended when range data cannot be verified.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 7.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.25 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.06 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 MYC-ESF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#719 of 97331 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #927 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MYC-ESF liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MYC and ESF into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn fees when trades use the pool, but large price differences between MYC and ESF can leave you with a less valuable mix of tokens than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 7.0% fee APR and 0.2% reward APR. 97% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no stated reward component currently supporting the APR. Reward dependency remains unresolved, and the pool's low 0.00x turnover indicates that the fee rate should not be treated as independent of trading activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, MYC-ESF carries high sensitivity to abrupt price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and asymmetric demand between the two assets. Emission decay is not currently the main stated risk because reward APR is zero, but any future incentives could decline or end; exit timing should account for falling volume, shrinking liquidity, or a loss of orderly two-sided markets.
tollMYC Context
MYC is one side of this pool and its price movement determines how the pool reallocates the LP's inventory between MYC and ESF. The supplied metrics do not establish MYC's liquidity depth elsewhere, so external exit capacity cannot be inferred from this pool's TVL alone. A sharp MYC move can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollESF Context
ESF is the counter-asset paired with MYC, so changes in ESF's price relative to MYC directly affect the LP's token mix and mark-to-market value. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics. Weak ESF liquidity or a rapid ESF repricing could make the position harder to unwind and amplify divergence loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MYC and ESF into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn fees when trades use the pool, but large price differences between MYC and ESF can leave you with a less valuable mix of tokens than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3yyN8HqyXrTUvYtyFizJXyfzmSgUTG83iUz1u1BTLrVd
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MYC (BN71JwRW…)
- Token B
- ESF (BzMWbt7k…)
- Created
- 9/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated reward APR is 0.2%, so the displayed 7.2% is presently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while leaving 7.0% dependent on trading activity.
The current stated reward APR is 0.2%, so the displayed 7.2% is presently fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while leaving 7.0% dependent on trading activity.
Because the current reward component is 0.2% and 97% of yield comes from fees, expiration of incentives would not remove the stated reward contribution at present. The remaining economics would depend on trading fees generated by the pool's 0.00x turnover and its $1K liquidity.
Because the current reward component is 0.2% and 97% of yield comes from fees, expiration of incentives would not remove the stated reward contribution at present. The remaining economics would depend on trading fees generated by the pool's 0.00x turnover and its $1K liquidity.
Risk is elevated because MEMECOIN prices can move abruptly, liquidity can leave quickly, and the available seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history cannot be quantified. The pool has $1K TVL and 0.00x Vol/TVL, so exit liquidity and fee generation deserve close monitoring.
Risk is elevated because MEMECOIN prices can move abruptly, liquidity can leave quickly, and the available seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history cannot be quantified. The pool has $1K TVL and 0.00x Vol/TVL, so exit liquidity and fee generation deserve close monitoring.
For MYC-ESF, consider exiting when TVL drains materially, trading volume weakens, fee-funded APR falls from 7.2%, or either token develops persistent one-sided price pressure. The absence of recent range and impermanent-loss readings argues for using observable liquidity and volume deterioration as practical exit signals.
For MYC-ESF, consider exiting when TVL drains materially, trading volume weakens, fee-funded APR falls from 7.2%, or either token develops persistent one-sided price pressure. The absence of recent range and impermanent-loss readings argues for using observable liquidity and volume deterioration as practical exit signals.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fees are stated at 7.0%, but that rate depends on trading activity and cannot be assumed to remain constant while MYC and ESF diverge.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fees are stated at 7.0%, but that rate depends on trading activity and cannot be assumed to remain constant while MYC and ESF diverge.
