SOL-CRCLxon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $200.37K
- APR
- 30.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $63.95K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- 3zozghHn…fDo2 · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 52/100, with Enter at 46/100, Hold at 58/100, Exit at 22/100, and a live verdict of HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the pool is presently assessed as monitorable rather than a clear new-entry or exit case: its fee-funded return and trading activity support continuation, while memecoin concentration and limited historical range data constrain conviction. Its rank of #237 among 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it relatively high in the tracked set, but that rank is not a guarantee of liquidity stability. A material TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; persistent volume with stable TVL and better evidence of time in range would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-10-26 19:34 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$200.37K
Total value locked
$63.95K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up30.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 24.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded range around the current SOL/CRCLX price, set an alert for a range exit, and rebalance only after confirming volume remains sufficient; withdraw if pool TVL falls by 30% from entry or the pair remains outside range for several sessions.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 30.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 26.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $63.95K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $159.87 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 10 SOL-CRCLx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#800 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6649 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CRCLx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CRCLX into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can change as prices move, and the memecoin may lose liquidity or value quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 26.9% from trading fees and 3.9% from rewards. 87% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current APR does not depend on an active reward schedule. Reward dependency and incentive duration are not established; any future reward program could change the mix without changing the underlying fee activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. SOL-CRCLX is a MEMECOIN pool: price divergence, liquidity withdrawal, and abrupt changes in swap flow can reduce LP returns even when the quoted fee APR remains high. Emission decay is an additional family-specific risk if incentives are introduced later; exit timing should be based on declining volume, shrinking TVL, or a sustained loss of trading activity rather than on APR alone.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and the pool's more broadly liquid side, with substantial liquidity across Solana venues outside this pair. SOL price moves against CRCLX change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when the relative price moves beyond the selected range. SOL's wider liquidity can support exits, but it does not remove CRCLX-specific price risk.
tollCRCLx Context
CRCLX is the pool's memecoin side, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pair and a limited set of related markets. A sharp CRCLX move against SOL can push the position toward one-sided inventory and increase impermanent-loss exposure. Weakening CRCLX liquidity can also make fee volume less persistent and make exits more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CRCLX into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount and mix of tokens you withdraw can change as prices move, and the memecoin may lose liquidity or value quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3zozghHn3cCmbAVPF3Bm5AiyT7VorSdHwTt2qJjLfDo2
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CRCLx (XsueG8Bt…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is represented by 26.9% in fees and 3.9% in rewards, with 87% of yield coming from trading fees. If emissions are added later and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on the 0.32x trading-activity ratio.
The current return is represented by 26.9% in fees and 3.9% in rewards, with 87% of yield coming from trading fees. If emissions are added later and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on the 0.32x trading-activity ratio.
The currently represented reward component is 3.9%, so there is no stated reward contribution to replace at present. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would move toward 26.9% unless trading volume or fee rates also change.
The currently represented reward component is 3.9%, so there is no stated reward contribution to replace at present. If incentives are introduced and later expire, total APR would move toward 26.9% unless trading volume or fee rates also change.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because CRCLX can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become one-sided against SOL. The pool has $200K TVL, $64K in 24-hour volume, and a 0.32x volume-to-TVL ratio, but those figures do not protect against price divergence or a rapid liquidity withdrawal.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because CRCLX can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become one-sided against SOL. The pool has $200K TVL, $64K in 24-hour volume, and a 0.32x volume-to-TVL ratio, but those figures do not protect against price divergence or a rapid liquidity withdrawal.
Consider exiting when TVL contracts materially, volume no longer supports 26.9%, the price remains outside your range, or CRCLX liquidity deteriorates. For this pool, those signals matter more than preserving a quoted 30.8% APR after trading activity has weakened.
Consider exiting when TVL contracts materially, volume no longer supports 26.9%, the price remains outside your range, or CRCLX liquidity deteriorates. For this pool, those signals matter more than preserving a quoted 30.8% APR after trading activity has weakened.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable. In a simplified static case, fee accrual at 26.9% could offset a fixed loss over time, but actual break-even depends on SOL/CRCLX price divergence, range placement, volume, and whether the fee rate persists.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable. In a simplified static case, fee accrual at 26.9% could offset a fixed loss over time, but actual break-even depends on SOL/CRCLX price divergence, range placement, volume, and whether the fee rate persists.
