new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. That places the current assessment on the exit side: the AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, so it is not among the weakest-ranked pools overall, but its current signal still reflects insufficient evidence that fee flow offsets memecoin and liquidity risk. The assessment would improve if the scanner ceased reporting CRITICAL, trading activity and TVL strengthened without relying on emissions, and the verdict moved away from EXIT; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$79.82K
Total value locked
$619.70
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not enter while the scanner remains CRITICAL and the live verdict is EXIT; if entering after that changes, use a monitored range and exit or rebalance when DNA leaves the range or pool TVL and swap activity begin to contract.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $619.70 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.55 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-DNA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3834 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 11% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6713 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-DNA liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DNA into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding SOL and DNA if their prices move apart, and this pool currently has limited trading activity and no displayed reward contribution.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 0.9% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the return depends on actual swap flow rather than emissions. Reward dependency and any reward schedule are not established, which limits confidence in future APR persistence.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so the realized price-divergence and range-management burden cannot be quantified from the available data. As a MEMECOIN pool, DNA can experience sharp repricing, thin liquidity, and fast divergence from SOL. Emission decay is a material family-specific risk if incentives are introduced or later reduced; exit timing matters because fee income may not compensate for a rapid DNA drawdown or a liquidity drain.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and normally provides the deeper external price-discovery market. SOL price moves change the pool's inventory balance relative to DNA; a sustained SOL rally or decline can leave an LP holding a different mix of SOL and DNA than intended.
tollDNA Context
DNA is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity and price discovery are likely more limited than SOL's and may vary substantially over time. A sharp DNA move can increase impermanent loss, while a fall in DNA liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting the LP position more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DNA into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding SOL and DNA if their prices move apart, and this pool currently has limited trading activity and no displayed reward contribution.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 45L3EuUJKyqhkNDfocrd3yAZu8nzMPXiHtwhjCvidgua
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- DNA (DiSetnR7…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall first; the current return is already primarily dependent on trading fees because 100% comes from fees.
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and total APR is 0.9%. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall first; the current return is already primarily dependent on trading fees because 100% comes from fees.
There is no established reward schedule to rely on, and the displayed reward APR is 0.0%. If incentives expire or decline, the remaining return would come from 0.9% in trading fees, which depends on the pool's swap activity rather than guaranteed payments.
There is no established reward schedule to rely on, and the displayed reward APR is 0.0%. If incentives expire or decline, the remaining return would come from 0.9% in trading fees, which depends on the pool's swap activity rather than guaranteed payments.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established token because DNA can move sharply, lose liquidity, or diverge from SOL. This pool also has $80K in liquidity, $620 in twenty-four-hour volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so exiting during stress may be difficult.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established token because DNA can move sharply, lose liquidity, or diverge from SOL. This pool also has $80K in liquidity, $620 in twenty-four-hour volume, and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio, so exiting during stress may be difficult.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, or trading activity weakens enough that fee income no longer justifies DNA exposure. A rapid DNA move outside the managed range is also a practical rebalance or exit trigger.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, or trading activity weakens enough that fee income no longer justifies DNA exposure. A rapid DNA move outside the managed range is also a practical rebalance or exit trigger.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and sustained fee volume are not reported. At 0.9% fee APR, recovery would depend on maintaining comparable trading activity while DNA and SOL prices either reconverge or stop diverging.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and sustained fee volume are not reported. At 0.9% fee APR, recovery would depend on maintaining comparable trading activity while DNA and SOL prices either reconverge or stop diverging.
